1999
DOI: 10.2307/256921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Notes: The Antecedents and Consequences of Union Commitment: A Meta-Analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
186
4
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
8
186
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings suggest that the Bamberger, Kluger, and Suchard (1999) model generalizes to the PRC, providing a reasonable fit, with most of the structural relationships of a similar size to those in their meta-analysis. The two main exceptions were: first, the organizational → union commitment parameter was larger in Bamberger, Kluger, and Suchard (1999) (0.69) than in our analysis (0.182), although in both it was significant and positive, suggesting dual loyalty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings suggest that the Bamberger, Kluger, and Suchard (1999) model generalizes to the PRC, providing a reasonable fit, with most of the structural relationships of a similar size to those in their meta-analysis. The two main exceptions were: first, the organizational → union commitment parameter was larger in Bamberger, Kluger, and Suchard (1999) (0.69) than in our analysis (0.182), although in both it was significant and positive, suggesting dual loyalty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…All were positive, including that from organizational commitment to union commitment. As in Bamberger, Kluger, and Suchard (1999), the direct effect of pro-union attitudes on union commitment was larger than that of union instrumentality.…”
Section: Union Commitment and Participation In The Chinese Context / 489mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As previously noted, empirical studies have documented that multiple commitments are possible. For example, it has been amply demonstrated that employees can have independent levels of commitment to their employers and the unions, which represent them (e.g., Bamberger, Kluger, & Suchard, 1999;Redman & Snape, 2005). Employees who formally work for a contractor but are assigned to a client organization similarly ought to be able to recognize, and differentiate, their commitment levels to their two distinct organizational targets.…”
Section: Contractor-based Antecedents Of Client Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%