2014
DOI: 10.1108/jtmc-08-2014-0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research of ethics, values and cross-cultural differences on China, Mexico or the United States

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study ethics, values and cross-cultural differences in China, Mexico or the United States. Three distinct and unique nations, the USA, Mexico and China, have different political structures, historical backgrounds and economical systems. While each of these nations can be considered an integral part to the world economy, each nation has their own distinct ethics, values and culture which serve as the backbone of the particular region. To be successful in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social interactions, professional training, and work environment can impact ethical values and behavior (Ahmed and Machold, 2004; Brown and Treviño, 2006; Mayer et al, 2009; Waples et al, 2009). Many scholars found that ethics training teaches appropriate business behaviors in working place (Higgins et al, 1984; Lysonski and Gaidis, 1991; Palmer and Zakhem, 2001; Phau and Kea, 2007; Saks and Ashforth, 2000; Stening and Skubik, 2007; Thelen and Zhuplev, 2002; Vardi, 2001; Villatoro and Chang, 2014; Whipple and Swords, 1992).…”
Section: Knowledge-stock Analysis: Major Trends and Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social interactions, professional training, and work environment can impact ethical values and behavior (Ahmed and Machold, 2004; Brown and Treviño, 2006; Mayer et al, 2009; Waples et al, 2009). Many scholars found that ethics training teaches appropriate business behaviors in working place (Higgins et al, 1984; Lysonski and Gaidis, 1991; Palmer and Zakhem, 2001; Phau and Kea, 2007; Saks and Ashforth, 2000; Stening and Skubik, 2007; Thelen and Zhuplev, 2002; Vardi, 2001; Villatoro and Chang, 2014; Whipple and Swords, 1992).…”
Section: Knowledge-stock Analysis: Major Trends and Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%