2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-79770-6_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research of Second-Order Properties of NLFSR. Comparative Analysis of M-NLFSR and M-LFSR

Abstract: The linear complexity (Li) of PRS is the shortest shift register, which generates a given periodic sequence, provided that the first L values of the sequence are the initial filling of the register [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].Estimation of linear complexity is one of the main parameters of the system. Any sequence that can be generated automatically (linear or nonlinear) over a finite field has finite linear complexity. Thus, it is possible to build an algorithm that will determine the linear complexity of any se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, NLFSR sequences can be more cryptographically secure than LFSR sequences. The security of NLFSRs was examined in [8]. An important result is that with high probability, the linear complexity of a randomly chosen maximum period NLFSR will be very close to 2 n .…”
Section: Lfsr and Nlfsr Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, NLFSR sequences can be more cryptographically secure than LFSR sequences. The security of NLFSRs was examined in [8]. An important result is that with high probability, the linear complexity of a randomly chosen maximum period NLFSR will be very close to 2 n .…”
Section: Lfsr and Nlfsr Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the existing self-shrinking generators employ a nonlinear feedback shift register (NLFSR). This is despite the fact that NLFSRs can provide greater security than LFSRS [8]. Thus, in this paper the concept of shrinking is combined with NLFSRs to get the benefits of both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%