Research of varying levels of greenhouse gas emissions in European countries using the k-means method

Abstract

a b s t r a c tGreenhouse gas emissions are a global problem. Although the EU countries from 1990 to 2012 reduced their total emissions by 19.2% (CO 2 eq.), it is still necessary to limit their emissions. In the article the possibility of using the taxonomic methods that allow grouping (classifying) objects described by many attributes (variables) is presented. In particular, cluster analysis was used, in which some methods for the isolation of homogeneous subsets of surveyed objects can be distinguished. One of such method is kmeans algorithm. As a measure of similarity of objects in clusters the Euclidean distance was applied. In the analysis 28 European countries were taken as objects of research and they were described by four attributes (variables), i.e. the emission levels of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen oxides and nitrous oxide. The aim of the analysis is to grouping objects e the European countries e into clusters that are most similar to each other in the same cluster and most unlike in other clusters. The research was carried out according to total greenhouse gas emissions, and according to emissions of these gases per capita of the countries surveyed. The analyses are based on Eurostat reports.

Borehole and Near-Surface Greenhouse Gas Emission Monitoring System with Self-calibrating Algorithm and Zone-Based Data Analysis via Clustering Technique

“…Algorithm for creating clusters is strongly dependent on the value of k. The number of clusters should be large enough that clusters will reflect the specific characteristics of the data set. At the same time, however, the value of k must be significantly less than the number of objects in the data set, because that is the meaning of the grouping [14].…”

Method for Assessing the Development of Underground Hard Coal Mines on a Regional Basis: The Concept of Measurement and Research Results

“…gas hazards 7coal dust explosion hazards (8) rock burst hazards (9) fire risks (10) water hazards (11) productivity of underground workers (12) wall efficiency (13) seam efficiency 14intensity of preparatory works (15) the number of walls reinforced annually (16) unit efficiency (17) relative efficiency in a group of mining plants (18) unit production costs (19) share of fixed costs in total costs (20) In this stage of examination, an assessment was carried out with a questionnaire to determine the importance of ranks assigned to the given groups (from I to IV) covering the selected criteria: geological and mining, natural hazard, production, and economic. Twenty-four experts in hard coal mining representing the academic and business environment evaluated the importance of the selected groups on a scale from 0% to 100%, with an accuracy of 10%.…”

“…These parameters determine the operational production capabilities. In a full assessment of production capacities, it is also necessary to refer to strategic investment capabilities, which are defined by the number of walls reinforced annually (15) and the intensity of preparatory works (16). The relative values constructed in this way allowed us to objectify the value of extraction and take into account the potential of human resources and the existing and emerging technical infrastructure [83][84][85].…”

“…However, prioritizing economic criteria led to the situation in which the group of mines with significant development potential included plants with a low unit cost of extraction per tonne, but the low quality of the extracted raw material caused selling problems in the future. In the last 10 years, the situation was additionally complicated by the tightening of climate requirements by the European Union, which increased the quality of hard coal quality priorities, including primarily calorific value as well as sulfur and ash content [13][14][15][16][17]. In such circumstances, profitable and efficient extraction in a long-term existence time horizon mine becomes insufficient to make a final assessment of the continuation or liquidation of exploitation.…”

Clustering Analysis on the Introduction of Talents in Colleges

“…Halčinová et al [9] used clustering analysis as a tool for creation of groups of similar stock items leading to speed up the company's reactions on customers' requirements. Kijewska and Bluszcz [10] used clustering analysis to distinguish the isolation of homogeneous subsets of surveyed objects.…”