2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3085338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on a Product Quality Monitoring Method Based on Multi Scale PP-YOLO

Abstract: To monitor product quality in the production process in real time, this thesis proposes a quality monitoring model based on PaddlePaddle You Only Look Once (PP-YOLO). First, in the preprocessing stage, the data enhancement method and the K-means++ method are used to improve the robustness of the algorithm, and the generated anchor box can screen more refined features earlier. Second, ResNet50-vd with the deformable convolution idea is selected as the backbone of the detection model, the feature pyramid network… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variant PP-YOLOE-l achieves 51.4 mAP and 78.1 FPS, outperforming YOLOX in speed and accuracy [15].The thesis uses PP-YOLO to evaluate product quality in real time while also optimizing data processing and model efficiency. Achieves industrial precision and speed, demonstrating deep learning's potential for quality control [16].Enhanced PP-YOLO and improved Deep-SORT, with ResNet50 and margin loss, develop a real-time UAV tracking system (91.6%) that overcomes minor, featureless problems and interference issues [17].Traditional fire detection approaches have drawbacks; PP-YOLO, a cutting-edge object recognition model, uses computer vision and deep learning to enhance, promising early fire detection [18]. Study pioneers' real-time bivalve behavior monitoring for pollution utilizing four machine learning approaches, achieving anomaly identification without false alarms, demonstrating the possibility for automated aquatic pollution monitoring [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variant PP-YOLOE-l achieves 51.4 mAP and 78.1 FPS, outperforming YOLOX in speed and accuracy [15].The thesis uses PP-YOLO to evaluate product quality in real time while also optimizing data processing and model efficiency. Achieves industrial precision and speed, demonstrating deep learning's potential for quality control [16].Enhanced PP-YOLO and improved Deep-SORT, with ResNet50 and margin loss, develop a real-time UAV tracking system (91.6%) that overcomes minor, featureless problems and interference issues [17].Traditional fire detection approaches have drawbacks; PP-YOLO, a cutting-edge object recognition model, uses computer vision and deep learning to enhance, promising early fire detection [18]. Study pioneers' real-time bivalve behavior monitoring for pollution utilizing four machine learning approaches, achieving anomaly identification without false alarms, demonstrating the possibility for automated aquatic pollution monitoring [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, the YOLO framework was selected. It uses a multi-scale detection method, which enables it to detect objects at different scales and to adapt to changes in the size and shape of the objects being observed [ 88 ]. Besides, YOLO is highly effective in detecting small objects with high accuracy and precision [ 89 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Betti and Tucci (2023), emphasized the importance of variation in the dataset to train the object detection model. According to Li et al (2021), there is a positive relationship between the number of datasets used and the accuracy level of the model in detecting objects. The larger the number of datasets used in training, the higher the accuracy level of the model in recognizing and detecting objects.…”
Section: Dataset Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, calculating the equations from the confusion matrix resulted in an accuracy of 0.82 or 82%, precision of 0.80, and recall of 0.84. According to Li et al (2021), an accuracy value of 1 indicates perfect classification, while a value of 0 indicates very poor classification. A precision value of 1 indicates that all predicted positive objects are correct, while a value of 0 indicates that no objects are correctly predicted as positive.…”
Section: Figure 11 Confusion Matrix Yolov5xmentioning
confidence: 99%