Research on Application of Wiki-Based Collaborative Lesson-Preparing

Zhou, Ya; Gong, Chaohua

doi:10.1109/wicom.2008.2862

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Statements that should not be underestimated are, for example, Microsoft Word is the "familiar form" or "feels more beautiful" because they indicate a high entry hurdle for the use of a new tool (cf. [26,79]).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many teachers find exchanging their designs helpful in order to receive feedback or as a source of inspiration for their own plans (cf. [26,27]).…”

Section: Fr13 Sharing Of Plansmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considered here are the following tools: Lesson Planning System (LPS, [43]), Support for Teachers Enhancing Performance in Schools (STEPS, [44]), Instructional Planning Assistant System (IPAS, [45]), TaskStream (TS, [46]), Eduwiki (EW, [26]), Inquiry in Motion Dynamic Lesson Planning Tool (IIM, [47]), Smart Lesson Planning System (SLP, [19]), Learning Activity Management System (LAMS, [48,49]), Phoebe Pedagogic Planner (Ph., [50]), and The Learning Designer (LDSE, [51]) as well as the newer web-based version (LDw, [52]).…”

Section: Existing Lesson Planning Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

PLATON: Developing a Graphical Lesson Planning System for Prospective Teachers

Strickroth

2019

Education Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lesson planning is both an important and demanding task—especially as part of teacher training. This paper presents the requirements for a lesson planning system and evaluates existing systems regarding these requirements. One major drawback of existing software tools is that most are limited to a text- or form-based representation of the lesson designs. In this article, a new approach with a graphical, time-based representation with (automatic) analyses methods is proposed and the system architecture and domain model are described in detail. The approach is implemented in an interactive, web-based prototype called PLATON, which additionally supports the management of lessons in units as well as the modelling of teacher and student-generated resources. The prototype was evaluated in a study with 61 prospective teachers (bachelor’s and master’s preservice teachers as well as teacher trainees in post-university teacher training) in Berlin, Germany, with a focus on usability. The results show that this approach proofed usable for lesson planning and offers positive effects for the perception of time and self-reflection.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many teachers find exchanging their designs helpful in order to receive feedback or as a source of inspiration for their own plans (cf. [26,27]).…”

Section: Fr13 Sharing Of Plansmentioning

confidence: 99%