2020
DOI: 10.17559/tv-20190822100443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Bridge Structural Health Assessment Based on Finite Element Analysis

Abstract: In view of the content of bridge condition assessment and health monitoring, this paper is based on the finite element simulation analysis. The uncertain finite element model updating method based on sequential optimization strategy is studied, and the uncertain modal parameter data obtained by health monitoring system are applied to upgrade the uncertain finite element model of cable-stayed bridges, which provides a more accurate finite element model for subsequent reliability analysis. Firstly, the finite el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The likelihood that these variables will be correlated is high, and so it is essential to ensure they will not adversely affect the data model. Several methods can be used to detect multicollinearity; the method used here is the one proposed by [ 45 ]. This method uses the condition index and the regression coefficient variance to determine the overall level of multicollinearity.…”
Section: Data Modelling For Use With Sparse Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likelihood that these variables will be correlated is high, and so it is essential to ensure they will not adversely affect the data model. Several methods can be used to detect multicollinearity; the method used here is the one proposed by [ 45 ]. This method uses the condition index and the regression coefficient variance to determine the overall level of multicollinearity.…”
Section: Data Modelling For Use With Sparse Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element (FE) analysis is the most accurate and effective method for assessing structural health (Y. Liang et al, 2012;Luo et al, 2020;Yu & Adeli, 1993). A few studies updated the FE model according to the dynamic characteristics (García-Palencia & Santini-Bell, 2013;Oh et al, 2015;Yin & Zhu, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies used probability theory to estimate the residual bearing capacity of components (Cheng et al., 2019; Dai & Cao, 2017; Hughes et al., 2021; Iamsumang et al., 2015). Finite element (FE) analysis is the most accurate and effective method for assessing structural health (Y. Liang et al., 2012; Luo et al., 2020; Yu & Adeli, 1993). A few studies updated the FE model according to the dynamic characteristics (García‐Palencia & Santini‐Bell, 2013; Oh et al., 2015; Yin & Zhu, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It refers to updating the finite element (FE) numerical model to adopt more precise and accurate structural dynamics parameters based on the known dynamics or statical parameters obtained through experimental investigations of a structure [12][13][14][15][16] (Figure 2). During the model updating procedure, the most commonly used model updating parameters are the material [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and geometrical characteristics [23][24][25][26] and boundary conditions [27][28][29], but their selection is generally based on performing the sensitivity analysis [30]. The selection of materials and the definition of their properties cause great difficulties in the development of a numerical model due to their specific mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%