2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on deep learning in apple leaf disease recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method achieved overall accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 scores of 99.11%, 99.11%, 99.49%, and 0.9929%, respectively. In another application, three methods, including regression, multilabel classification and a focus loss function based on the DenseNet-121 DCNN, were proposed to detect diseases on apple leaves 99 . The proposed three methods obtained accuracies of 93.5%, 93.3%, and 93.7% on the test dataset, which are better than those obtained by the traditional multiclassification approach.…”
Section: Applications Of Deep Learning In Horticulture Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method achieved overall accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 scores of 99.11%, 99.11%, 99.49%, and 0.9929%, respectively. In another application, three methods, including regression, multilabel classification and a focus loss function based on the DenseNet-121 DCNN, were proposed to detect diseases on apple leaves 99 . The proposed three methods obtained accuracies of 93.5%, 93.3%, and 93.7% on the test dataset, which are better than those obtained by the traditional multiclassification approach.…”
Section: Applications Of Deep Learning In Horticulture Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using pre-trained disease recognition models, deep transfer learning was performed to generate networks that could make accurate predictions. Zhong et al [30] proposed three methods of regression, multilabel classification and focus loss function based on DenseNet-121 CNN to identify apple leaf diseases. The proposed methods achieve 93.51, 93.31 and 93.71% accuracy on the test set.…”
Section: Existing Image Recognition Methods Of Plant Disease Identifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of adversarial sample detection methods against adversarial attacks is also studied. Without loss of generality, we present the results of apple leaf disease identification for which several DL models have been developed [30,35]. Although we only report the results of apple leaf disease identification, our unreported experiments obtained similar results from other leaf disease datasets.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In this study, we consider four pre-trained DNN models that have been widely applied for plant disease identification: VGGNet [3,5,17,[29][30][31][32], ResNet [17,29,33], Inception [17,33,34] and DenseNet [4,17,35].…”
Section: Pre-trained Dnn Models For Plant Disease Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%