2018
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2018.1495836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on effectiveness of technology transfer in technology alliances: evidence from Turkish SMEs

Abstract: Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author's name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pagination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed management and OB scholars have started to express a greater interest toward behavioral issues regarding what a fitting context for KMS and innovativeness should be, as evident from the multiple calls and editorials (Sergeeva and Andreeva, 2016;Michailova, 2011;Bamberger, 2008;Johns, 2006). In this paper, following Ghoschal and Barlett (1994), Cabrera et al (2006), Wang and Noe (2010), Huang et al (2011), Lin et al (2012, Schmitz et al (2014), Verma and Sinha (2016), Günsel et al (2019) and Wang et al (2018), we identify top management support, mutual trust and reward systems as the primary characteristics of organizational context. So, we consider organizational context as a three-dimensional concept composed of top management support, mutual trust and reward systems, and we describe how each of these dimensions is related to KMS and firm innovativeness.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Indeed management and OB scholars have started to express a greater interest toward behavioral issues regarding what a fitting context for KMS and innovativeness should be, as evident from the multiple calls and editorials (Sergeeva and Andreeva, 2016;Michailova, 2011;Bamberger, 2008;Johns, 2006). In this paper, following Ghoschal and Barlett (1994), Cabrera et al (2006), Wang and Noe (2010), Huang et al (2011), Lin et al (2012, Schmitz et al (2014), Verma and Sinha (2016), Günsel et al (2019) and Wang et al (2018), we identify top management support, mutual trust and reward systems as the primary characteristics of organizational context. So, we consider organizational context as a three-dimensional concept composed of top management support, mutual trust and reward systems, and we describe how each of these dimensions is related to KMS and firm innovativeness.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The SCE assumes the existence of different levels placed in the supply chain, which are determined by predictability (the variability in achieving objectives) and control (actual results and targets) (Günsel et al 2019).…”
Section: Supply Chain Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the importance of the characteristics of partners for promoting their propensity to share information holds importance within the context of SMEs. In developing countries, SME managers attempt to develop the new practices, processes, norms and techniques that enable them to acquire knowledge, resources and the capacities necessary for successful transfers of new technologies from developed countries (Günsel et al , 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%