2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on energy-saving effect of technological progress based on Cobb–Douglas production function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the capital-labour-energy case, lacking materials, a measure somewhere between GVA and gross output seems logical, and this is indeed the path taken by Kander and Stern [126] and Van der Werf [25], who adopt a modified "gross output" measure as GVA plus the value (cost) of energy. It is revealing though that this is not a common approach, as empirical K-L-E CES studies adopt a wide range of output metrics, as shown in Table 1: A second important issue is whether to specify output in (more common) constant prices [15,69,70,74] or Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) prices [25,82]. Since PPP places a higher weight on GDP in non-OECD countries-one $US Dollar in China buys more goods than in the US-PPP may be useful in cross-country studies [129,130] by providing a more level playing field for comparisons.…”
Section: Economic Output (Y)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the capital-labour-energy case, lacking materials, a measure somewhere between GVA and gross output seems logical, and this is indeed the path taken by Kander and Stern [126] and Van der Werf [25], who adopt a modified "gross output" measure as GVA plus the value (cost) of energy. It is revealing though that this is not a common approach, as empirical K-L-E CES studies adopt a wide range of output metrics, as shown in Table 1: A second important issue is whether to specify output in (more common) constant prices [15,69,70,74] or Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) prices [25,82]. Since PPP places a higher weight on GDP in non-OECD countries-one $US Dollar in China buys more goods than in the US-PPP may be useful in cross-country studies [129,130] by providing a more level playing field for comparisons.…”
Section: Economic Output (Y)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including energy as a factor of production starts from the idea that variables in addition to labour and capital-such as energy [22,23,70], materials [46,86] or money balance [52,55]-help explain economic output. As far back as 1974, Binswanger and Ledergerber [87] suggested that "the decisive mistake of traditional economics is the neglect of energy as a factor of production".…”
Section: Wider Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, a value of 40.7% is an estimate based on a Cobb-Douglas specification used in an analysis of the energy-saving effects of technological progress in Chinese industry, which is characterized by high energy intensity (see Yuan et al 2009). The estimates of 35 and 17% are the values of energy input per unit of value added in non-metallic mineral products and paper products respectively across developing countries (see Upadhyaya 2010).…”
Section: Production Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is determined by the quantity, quality and efficiency of the above referred promoting factors [51]. The Cobb-Douglas production function was popular to measure the relationship between factors and economic growth [51]. The basic function is described as:…”
Section: Estimate Economic Benefits Of Land Usementioning
confidence: 99%