2019
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2018.2877187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Fast Design of Key Variables of Bearingless Flux-Switching Motor Based on Variable Structure Magnetic Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Design of different parameters like optimum tooth width, coupling of magnetic flux of winding and PM and optimum torque of HEFSM is challenging and time-consuming. In [15], a new variable structure magnetic network model method was proposed that greatly decreases the time necessary for HEFSM design. A consequent pole HEFSM was proposed in [19] with a flux bridge to prevent flux leakage from the stator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design of different parameters like optimum tooth width, coupling of magnetic flux of winding and PM and optimum torque of HEFSM is challenging and time-consuming. In [15], a new variable structure magnetic network model method was proposed that greatly decreases the time necessary for HEFSM design. A consequent pole HEFSM was proposed in [19] with a flux bridge to prevent flux leakage from the stator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the shortcomings of the FEA, scholars have proposed some analytical methods, including the magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) method [17], relative permeance method [18], Schwarz-Christoffel transform method [19], and subdomain model method [20], [21]. Nevertheless, to authors' knowledge, there are only two literatures related to BFSPM machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, to authors' knowledge, there are only two literatures related to BFSPM machines. In [17], the magnetic field of BFSPM machines is analytically calculated by the MEC method. Although the modeling of the MEC method considers the magnetic saturation, but there are some problems in the magnetic equivalent circuit method, such as the complicated modeling process and long iterative calculation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%