2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on foil thermal features of hydrodynamic air foil bearing with the Three-dimensional heat transfer model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Extensive theoretical and experimental research has been conducted by scholars for a better understanding of thermal characteristics of foil bearings. [13][14][15][16] Andrés and Kim 17 established a two-dimensional TEHD coupling analysis model for bump foil journal bearings, considering material property variations and thermal expansion of bearing components. Lehn et al 18 proposed a threedimensional TEHD coupling model for bump foil thrust bearings, incorporating thrust plate thermal extension and cooling gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Extensive theoretical and experimental research has been conducted by scholars for a better understanding of thermal characteristics of foil bearings. [13][14][15][16] Andrés and Kim 17 established a two-dimensional TEHD coupling analysis model for bump foil journal bearings, considering material property variations and thermal expansion of bearing components. Lehn et al 18 proposed a threedimensional TEHD coupling model for bump foil thrust bearings, incorporating thrust plate thermal extension and cooling gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the effect of the rarefied gas [13] and viscous dissipation [21] was also explored to describe the flow features accurately in GFJB. However, all numerical research above can not avoid solving the compressible Reynolds lubrication equation, except for the semi-analytical solution [25] or three-dimensional (3D) fluid-solid coupling simulation [26]. Thus, an appropriate solution is needed in engineering practices to balance the computational cost and accuracy [19] of GFJB, which also applies to TFJB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%