Research on horizontal compensation of ecological economic benefits under differential responsibility

Xi, Bin; Jing, Huimin

doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12835-8

Cited by 12 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The low eco-environmental quality area (L-L) is classified as the management area, requiring multi-layer and intensive treatments such as ecological rehabilitation. The government should develop the corresponding protective strategies to motivate and compensate the coal mines by implementing eco-environmental protection policies 55 . Also, coal enterprises should control the intensity of land utilization and building density, and strengthen green infrastructure design, for example, filling topsoil cracks and growing special plants with drought tolerance since developed roots to prevent water and soil erosion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of eco-environmental quality for the coal-mining region using multi-source data

Jiang

Fan

Zhang

et al. 2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The contradiction between the exploitation of coal resources and the protection of the ecological environment in western China is becoming increasingly prominent. Reasonable ecological environment evaluation is the premise for alleviating this contradiction. First, this paper evaluates the eco-environment of Ibei coalfield by combining the genetic projection pursuit model and geographic information system (GIS) and using remote sensing image data and other statistical data of this area. The powerful spatial analysis function of GIS and the advantages of the genetic projection pursuit model in weight calculation have been fully used to improve the reliability of the evaluation results. Furthermore, spatial autocorrelation is used to analyze the spatial characteristics of ecological environment quality in the mining area and plan the specific governance scope. The geographic detector is used to determine the driving factors of the eco-environment of the mining area. The results show that Ibei Coalfield presents a spatially heterogeneous eco-environment pattern. The high-intensity mining area (previously mined area of Ili No.4 Coal Mine) has the worst ecological environment quality, followed by the coal reserve area of Ili No.4 Coal Mine and the planned survey area of Ili No.5 Coal Mine. The eco-environment quality (EEQ) of the study area is affected by both human and natural factors. Mining intensity and surface subsidence are the main human factors affecting the ecological environment in the study area. The main natural factors affecting the ecological environment in the study area are annual average precipitation, elevation, annual average evaporation, NDVI and land use type. Meanwhile, the interaction effect of any two indicators is greater than that of a single indicator. It is also indicated that the eco-environment of the mining area is nonlinearly correlated to impact indicators. The spatial autocorrelation analysis shows three areas that should be treated strategically that are the management area, close attention area and protective area. Corresponding management measures are put forward for different regions. This paper can provide scientific references for mining area eco-environmental protection, which is significant for the sustainability of coal mine projects.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of eco-environmental quality for the coal-mining region using multi-source data

Jiang

Fan

Zhang

et al. 2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, Xie et al [16] found that China's economic growth has an inverted U-shaped impact on PM2.5 concentrations. Similarly, Xi and Jing [17] analyzed the evolution of ecological deficits and surplus areas and their per capita coal consumption in 30 provinces in China, and the results demonstrated that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the ecological environment and economic growth in each region. However, Wang et al [18] proved an N-shaped relationship between CO 2 emissions and economic growth in the same region.…”

Section: Studies On the Effects Of Economic Growth On Environment Pollutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic Impact of Environmental Regulation on Environmental Performance in China: New Evidence from a Semiparametric Additive Panel Analysis

Long

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Environmental protection is the core of sustainable economic development, and environmental policy plays a key role in achieving protection goals. Therefore, it is extremely crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of environmental policies. Existing studies mainly focus on the average impact of environmental policies on environmental pollution but ignore their dynamic impact, which is prone to misestimate the effect of environmental policies. To make up for the deficiency, a semiparametric additive panel data model is used to explore the dynamic impact of China’s sewage charging policy on environmental performance at each level of the levy. The results show that the relationship between sewage charge level and environmental degeneration is an “M-shaped” pattern, indicating that the current sewage charge policy is not absolutely effective. Moreover, the results also reveal an “N-shaped” linkage between economic growth and environmental pollution, indicating that economic development is not sustainable. Moreover, the factors of energy consumption, population growth, and industrialization contribute to increasing environmental degeneration. Although technological development has a positive impact on environmental performance, its impact is insignificant. This study could provide new evidence for strengthening environmental regulatory reform and promoting green economic development.

show abstract

“…The low eco-environmental quality area (L-L) is classi ed as the management area, requiring multi-layer and intensive treatments such as ecological rehabilitation. The government should design the corresponding protective strategies to motivate and compensate the coal mines implementing ecoenvironmental protection policies 37 . Also, coal enterprises should control the intensity of land utilisation and building density, and strengthen green infrastructure design by, for example, lling topsoil cracks and growing special plants with drought tolerance and developed roots to prevent water and soil erosion.…”

Section: Mining Area Eco-environment Management Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Eco-environmental Quality of Coal Mining Area Using Multi-source Data – A Case Regarding Ibei Coalfield, Northwestern China

Jiang

Fan

Zhang

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eco-environmental evaluation is a prerequisite for balancing the relationship between coal resource recovery and eco-environmental protection. This paper divides the eco-environment system in coal mining area into 5 subsystems regarding geomorphology, climate, hydrology, land and vegetation, and human activity. Within the 5 subsystems, 13 indicators capable of reflecting eco-environment levels of coal mine fields are selected, weighed using genetic projection pursuit model, and applied to eco-environmental quality evaluation. Based on this, the spatial feature of the quality is analysed using spatial autocorrelation method, recognising the areas that need managements. Factors driving the eco-environment characteristics of coal mines are identified using geographic detector. The feasibility of the developed evaluation system is verified with Ibei Coalfield as a case. The results show that Ibei Coalfield sees a spatially heterogeneous eco-environment pattern. Geographic detector can quantify the impact of various indicators on ecological environment, and the indicator is of stronger interpretation ability as interacting with others. It is also indicated that mining area eco-environment is nonlinearly correlated to impact indicators. The spatial autocorrelation analysis suggests three areas that should be treated strategically, that are the management area, close attention area and protective area. This paper can provide scientific references for mining area eco-environmental protection, which is significant for the sustainability of coal mine projects.

show abstract

Research on horizontal compensation of ecological economic benefits under differential responsibility

Cited by 12 publications

References 39 publications

Evaluation of eco-environmental quality for the coal-mining region using multi-source data

Evaluation of eco-environmental quality for the coal-mining region using multi-source data

Dynamic Impact of Environmental Regulation on Environmental Performance in China: New Evidence from a Semiparametric Additive Panel Analysis

Evaluation of Eco-environmental Quality of Coal Mining Area Using Multi-source Data – A Case Regarding Ibei Coalfield, Northwestern China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About