Research on Knowledge Organization of Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on Metadata

Abstract

Metadata has been analyzed and summarized. Based on Dublin Core metadata, combined with the characteristics and forms of intangible cultural heritage, this article explores the metadata for intangible cultural heritage in knowledge organizations based on relevant resource description standards. The Wuhan woodcarving ship model is presented as an example of national intangible cultural heritage to control the application of metadata in intangible cultural heritage knowledge organizations. New ideas are provided for the digital development of intangible cultural heritage.

Can UNESCO Use BLOCKCHAIN To Ensure the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity? A Systemic Approach That Explains the Why, How, and Difficulties of Such a Venture

“…The necessity of these interconnections has already been traced [22], and so new metadata models must be designed which at the same time must be fully compatible with the most used/well-known standards. One of the most prominent and most used frameworks for metadata is the Dublin Core Application Profiler (DCAP) [23] which provides interoperability between the metadata of cultural elements.…”

“…The table 1 "Core metadata of intangible cultural heritage digital resources" of the article "Research on knowledge Organization of Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on Metadata"[22]. This table depicts an ICH archive metadata schema containing 23 Dublin Core elements and extended elements, and unifies the information format and mutual mapping relationship of ICH digital achievements.…”

Using Fractal Enterprise Modeling in Strategic Analysis with Focus on Intangibles: Empirical Study in Product Innovation

“…Yet, there is a very limited spectrum of EM approaches concerning integrating and understanding the intangibles in organizational settings. Even though some examples of the intangibles' incorporation into the EM languages can be found in, e.g., iStar [62], through a combination of the knowledge management (KM) and EM disciplines [15], [24], [29], [30], and simulation techniques to characterize the intangible assets [14], most of the recent research is dominated by measuring the impact of intangibles on the business performance using the mathematical models [10]- [12], [17], [39], [40]. Thus, there is no obvious solution to how to incorporate the intangibles into the business analysis within the existing EM models, e.g., within their hierarchy, components, composition, origin, possession, how they are used and interwoven into the tangible settings, etc.…”

“…The main requirement for the evaluation of FEM for the presented purpose is the possibility to represent the value added resource development concept [12] and its usefulness in the business analysis. Because the knowledge obtained in this work may belong to either the inner or outer environmental layer in relation to FEM application for the purpose, the behavior of the artifact is constrained by both.…”

“…To this point, there are very few studies trying to address the problem of the intangibles' underrepresentation within enterprise models, see examples in [15], [24], [27]- [30]. At present, the intangibles are represented by the generic, well-established conceptual models or frameworks, e.g., resource value hierarchy [31], learning and knowledge models [32]- [34], dynamic capability or change models [35]- [38], etc., and by largely dominating mathematical models (to name a few [10]- [12], [16], [39]- [42]). The mathematical models are oriented on proving and emphasizing the significance and/or impact of the intangibles on the organizational performance; rather than their constituents, configuration, and application that may help to improve the resource management in a given business instance.…”