Research on Multi-Scale Ecological Network Connectivity—Taking the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area as a Case Study

Abstract

The Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area urban agglomeration is an urban agglomeration with some of the most intensive urbanization since 1980s. A large amount of cultivated land, forest land, water bodies and other land types in the region has been occupied by construction land, resulting in fragmented ecological landscapes and biodiversity in the region and causing many other ecological problems. Based on this, this paper takes the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area as a case study, constructs an ecological network of the dispersion scale of five species from 1990 to 2020 based on a morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) method, identifies the ecological groups in the network and uses the core node-based community evolution path tracking algorithm to analyze the ecological groups in order to explore the changes of ecological network connectivity at different scales in the region and to reveal the overall and local characteristics and changes of the migratory space of terrestrial mammals with different dispersion capabilities. The research results show that: (1) From 1990 to 2020, the area of construction land in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area increased sharply, with good connectivity in the northwest, southwest and eastern regions and poor connectivity in the central region. (2) There are obvious differences between the overall and local changes in the connectivity trends of multi-scale regional ecological networks. On the whole, the overall ecological connectivity of the ecological network at each scale showed a gradual upward trend, and the overall connectivity index IIC and the possible connectivity index PC gradually increased with the increase of the maximum dispersal distance of species. From the perspective of local patches, the larger the species dispersion scale, the larger the value of the revised betweenness centrality index and the patch possible connectivity index. (3) The distribution of ecological groups at different species dispersion scales is different, and the smaller the dispersal scale of the species, the greater the distribution of ecological groups. Small-scale species are limited by the maximum dispersal distance, and the range of their ecological groups is generally small. Small-scale (3 km), mesoscale (10 km) and large-scale (30 km) core nodes of ecological groups show a gradual increase trend, and the overall connectivity of ecological groups has improved. However, the core nodes of the extra-large-scale (60 km) and ultra-large-scale (100 km) ecological groups show a trend of decreasing fluctuations, and the overall connectivity within the ecological group has declined. This study is helpful to clarify the structural characteristics of regional ecological space and provide a theoretical basis for regional ecological planning.

Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in the Yellow River Source Region Based on MSPA and MCR Modelling

“…In addition to patch abundance and spatial arrangement, these indices combine the dispersal specificity of plant habitats. Wu et al [ 26 ] took the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as an example, and found that the overall ecological connectivity of ecological networks at all scales showed a gradual upward trend, and the overall connectivity index (IIC) and the possible connectivity index (PC) gradually increased with the increase in the maximum dispersal distance of species. Javier Babi Almenar [ 27 ] integrated a landscape index analysis, including the overall connectivity index (IIC), probable connectivity index (PC), and equivalent connectivity index (EC) to show that from 1999 to 2007, habitat fragmentation and loss increased ecological connectivity in Luxembourg, Western Europe.…”

Spatial Optimization with Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis for Green Space Conservation Planning

“…However, these traditional indicators could not completely set apart multiple morphological layouts with diverse environmental effects [43,44]. In particular, the connecting passageways that will enable the efficient movement of species between various habitats (i.e., ecological corridors) play a prominent part in the conservation of biodiversity [45][46][47][48]. Unfortunately, these narrow-shaped components are very difficult to be automatically generated through spatial optimization techniques [38,49].…”