2023
DOI: 10.3390/buildings13092311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Quantitative Assessment and Dynamic Reasoning Method for Emergency Response Capability in Prefabricated Construction Safety

Shanrong Tang,
Ke Zhu,
Peiwen Guo

Abstract: In response to the common issues of lacking a comprehensive quantitative assessment system and insufficient dynamic understanding of emergency response capability in prefabricated construction safety, this study proposes a research methodology based on decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and fuzzy cognitive maps (FCM) to promote the construction of emergency response capacity. Firstly, a quantitative evaluation indicator system comprising 4 core categories of organizational management, pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prefabricated construction encompasses intricate and interrelated processes, contributing to a higher frequency of safety incidents as compared to traditional construction (Tang et al, 2023). The cycle of prefabricated building is divided into three active stages/phases: The off-site manufacture, transportation, and hoisting and splicing on-site assembly (Khan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Modular Construction Risk Factors: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prefabricated construction encompasses intricate and interrelated processes, contributing to a higher frequency of safety incidents as compared to traditional construction (Tang et al, 2023). The cycle of prefabricated building is divided into three active stages/phases: The off-site manufacture, transportation, and hoisting and splicing on-site assembly (Khan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Modular Construction Risk Factors: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%