2021 IEEE International Conference on Electronic Technology, Communication and Information (ICETCI) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icetci53161.2021.9563444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on RFID Indoor Positioning Algorithm Based on Attention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tang et al [24] 0.2015 0.3657 0.2603 0.1973 0.3607 0.2592 MHSA-EC [22] 0 MSE and 37.3% MDE reduction in all cases compared to Kalman filtering). We also observe that as the number of time steps increases (more packets are used to form an input), the performances of average filtering and Kalman filtering on the two datasets also become better.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of the Attentional Filtering Blockmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Tang et al [24] 0.2015 0.3657 0.2603 0.1973 0.3607 0.2592 MHSA-EC [22] 0 MSE and 37.3% MDE reduction in all cases compared to Kalman filtering). We also observe that as the number of time steps increases (more packets are used to form an input), the performances of average filtering and Kalman filtering on the two datasets also become better.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of the Attentional Filtering Blockmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We compare the proposed AnFIPNet with the following methods: (MUSIC) algorithm; [ 33 ] PDDA; [ 18 ] MHSA‐EC; [ 22 ] Hi‐Loc; [ 23 ] attention‐based IPS model by Tang et al; [ 24 ] Gaussian–Bernoulli restricted Boltzmann machine plus liquid‐state machine (GBRBM + LSM); [ 34 ] time series attentional prototype network (TapNet); [ 20 ] CNN‐based joint APs model by Koutris et al; [ 9 ] and 2D image CNN by Hajiakhondi et al [ 11 ] For the MUSIC and PDDA algorithm, due to various interference and complex indoor environments, we remove 10% maximum and minimum phase difference outliers of each anchor to mitigate the phase difference fluctuations. After deriving the angle estimations from anchors, we use the least squares to estimate the final 2D positions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations