2019
DOI: 10.3390/min9050291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the Adsorption Behavior of Heavy Metal Ions by Porous Material Prepared with Silicate Tailings

Abstract: Tailings generated from mineral processing have attracted worldwide concerns due to creating serious environmental pollution. In this work, porous adsorbents were prepared as a porous block by using silicate tailings, which can adsorb heavy metal ions from the solution and are easy to separate. The synthesized silicate porous material (SPM) was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Brunner–Emmet–Teller (BET), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The material presented a surface area of 3.40 m2⸱g−1, a po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
53
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
12
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data obtained from the Cu and Pb adsorption fitted well with the Langmuir adsorption model from the values of the correlation coefficients, which was indicative of chemical adsorption of these metals (Cu and Pb) on to the MCNC. Surprisingly, the data obtained from Fe adsorption fitted the Freundlich isotherm model (Table 2), suggesting that the adsorption sites were uneven and non-specific [37]. Although the adsorption coefficient is greatly consistent with the conditions that support favourable adsorption, it is suspected that dual mechanisms took part in the Fe adsorption, whereas the specific adsorption sites were consistent in the adsorption of Cu/Pb.…”
Section: Adsorption Isotherm Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The data obtained from the Cu and Pb adsorption fitted well with the Langmuir adsorption model from the values of the correlation coefficients, which was indicative of chemical adsorption of these metals (Cu and Pb) on to the MCNC. Surprisingly, the data obtained from Fe adsorption fitted the Freundlich isotherm model (Table 2), suggesting that the adsorption sites were uneven and non-specific [37]. Although the adsorption coefficient is greatly consistent with the conditions that support favourable adsorption, it is suspected that dual mechanisms took part in the Fe adsorption, whereas the specific adsorption sites were consistent in the adsorption of Cu/Pb.…”
Section: Adsorption Isotherm Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A possible explanation is that the application of perlite and iron as co-occurring separate pouches in (Sim2) led to more surface area contact between the perlite (highly porous adsorbing substance) and the iron Fe(s) (the displacer), Figure S1. However, the adsorption of heavy metal ions has been shown to increase gradually following the first minutes of contact and reaches an equilibrium over time [28].…”
Section: Sim1 Vs Sim2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption capacity of Pb (II) was considerably higher than for Cu (II) due to the electronegativity of Pb 2+ and Cu 2+ . Stronger attraction occurred between adsorbent and metal ion with higher electronegativity values (Pb: 2.33 and Cu: 1.95) [36]. Additionally, the smaller the hydrated ionic radius, the greater the affinity of the metal for the adsorption process (Pb: 4.01 Å and Cu: 4.19 Å) [37].…”
Section: Adsorption Mechanism and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%