2017
DOI: 10.4236/jmf.2017.71006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the Efficiency of Chinese Commercial Banks Based on Undesirable Output and Super-SBM DEA Model

Abstract: Based on Super-SBM DEA model, this paper investigates the efficiency of 12 Chinese commercial banks from 2005 to 2013 under the consideration of undesirable output, and verifies the truth that considering undesirable outputs (non-performing loans) can make research result more authentic by comparing with the consequence obtained without considering undesirable output. On this basis, this paper takes a further advantage of Malmquist index to analyze Chinese commercial bank efficiency. The results show that the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many previous studies have assessed banking performance by considering undesirable outputs (such as non-performing loans; see, for example, Huang et al [ 2 ], Park et al [ 12 ], Zha et al [ 22 ], Fukuyama and Weber [ 37 ] and Fukuyama et al [ 38 ]) and super efficiency (Khodabakhshi et al [ 13 ], Andersen et al [ 39 ], Chiu et al [ 40 ], Chen [ 41 ], Minh et al [ 42 ], Avkiran et al [ 43 ] and Zhou et al [ 44 ]) either separately or simultaneously [ 2 ], these models do not consider both super efficiency and heterogeneous factors, while they assume that banks share a common production frontier. Actually, the production sets of different banks may differ due to differences in physical and capital stocks, as well as the social and economic infrastructure in which the production occurs [ 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many previous studies have assessed banking performance by considering undesirable outputs (such as non-performing loans; see, for example, Huang et al [ 2 ], Park et al [ 12 ], Zha et al [ 22 ], Fukuyama and Weber [ 37 ] and Fukuyama et al [ 38 ]) and super efficiency (Khodabakhshi et al [ 13 ], Andersen et al [ 39 ], Chiu et al [ 40 ], Chen [ 41 ], Minh et al [ 42 ], Avkiran et al [ 43 ] and Zhou et al [ 44 ]) either separately or simultaneously [ 2 ], these models do not consider both super efficiency and heterogeneous factors, while they assume that banks share a common production frontier. Actually, the production sets of different banks may differ due to differences in physical and capital stocks, as well as the social and economic infrastructure in which the production occurs [ 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars considered undesirable outputs (non-performing loans) to evaluate the banking performance, for instance [ 33 ]; [ 43 ] and [ 55 , 56 ]. Simultaneously, [ 34 ] and [ 57 62 ], followed the super-efficiency model in data envelopment analysis. However, heterogeneous factors are ignored while evaluating the baking performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If   =1, the eco-efficiency of DMU0 is said to be efficient, and PTE and SE are also efficient. If   <1, the DMU0 is considered to be inefficient, and PTE or SE is inefficient but can be improved by deleting the excess in bad outputs and augmenting the shortfalls in good outputs via the SBM-projection [41]. In this study, the agri-…”
Section: Dea-sbmmentioning
confidence: 99%