Research on the gold criteria of imaging to diagnose left ventricular non-compaction

Abstract

The gold standard for diagnosing left ventricular noncompaction evaluated in this article was compared using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. To generate results, the paper used systematic data analysis techniques such as article screening, data extraction, meta-analysis, and forest plots. Use data gaps exhibited on forest plots to eliminate untrustworthy data, shown here as major gaps with other data, that should be avoided in follow-up investigations. The value of the aforementioned gold standard for diagnosis is as follows. It was discovered that two figures demonstrated the reliability of cMRI, while the other demonstrated that the echocardiograph was more accurate. Two numbers were eliminated because there was no statistically significant difference, and the data p > 0.05. More data integration is still required.