2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the influence of anthropomorphic design on the consumers' express packaging recycling willingness:the moderating effect of psychological ownership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a marketing tool, anthropomorphism can release positive and engaging micro signals to consumers, enhancing perceptual fluency and gratifying an individual's need for social belonging (Chen et al, 2017). Ding et al (2021) noted that anthropomorphic designs evoke empathy and significantly affect consumers' willingness to recycle express packaging. Shao et al (2020) found that an anthropomorphic appearance would dramatically increase consumers' desire to purchase otherwise "ugly" food products.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a marketing tool, anthropomorphism can release positive and engaging micro signals to consumers, enhancing perceptual fluency and gratifying an individual's need for social belonging (Chen et al, 2017). Ding et al (2021) noted that anthropomorphic designs evoke empathy and significantly affect consumers' willingness to recycle express packaging. Shao et al (2020) found that an anthropomorphic appearance would dramatically increase consumers' desire to purchase otherwise "ugly" food products.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2017). Ding et al. (2021) noted that anthropomorphic designs evoke empathy and significantly affect consumers’ willingness to recycle express packaging.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropomorphism is a widely studied concept that has caught researchers' attention in recent decades. This attention has led to the expansion of anthropomorphism research into several areas, which includes management (Andersen, 2008; Ashforth et al, 2020), journalism (Nan et al, 2006; Shin, 2021; Waddell, 2018), consumer behaviour (Kim et al, 2020; Wan & Chen, 2021), advertising (Choi et al, 2001; Han et al, 2019; Lee & Oh, 2021; Zhou et al, 2021), branding (Dalman et al, 2021; Kwak et al, 2017; Lim, Im, & Lee, 2022; Lim, Kumar, et al, 2022), robotics (Hegel et al, 2008; Mende et al, 2019; Piçarra & Giger, 2018; Popov & Klimchik, 2019), theology (Guthrie, 2019; Yonan, 1995), psychology (Epley et al, 2007; Epley et al, 2008; Waytz et al, 2014), computer science (Charlton, 2006; Kiesler & Goetz, 2002; Kim et al, 2016; Luczak et al, 2003), social psychology (Epley, 2018; Kwan & Fiske, 2008; Nyhof & Johnson, 2017; Waytz et al, 2014), product design (Karanika & Hogg, 2020; Landwehr et al, 2011; Valenzuela & Hadi, 2017; van Tilburg et al, 2015), environmental sciences (Ding et al, 2021; Whitley et al, 2021), hospitality and tourism (Han et al, 2020; Martin et al, 2020), artificial intelligence (AI; Kim et al, 2019; Ochmann et al, 2021; Pelau et al, 2021; Persson et al, 2000; Proudfoot, 2011; Ruijten et al, 2018), and an emerging field within the ambit of marketing, that is, chatbot marketing (Balakrishnan et al, 2022; Crolic et al, 2022; Sheehan et al, 2020). As evident from the schol...…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other social influence factors that have been related to packaging recycling behaviour include personal norms, reputational concern and empathy (e.g. Alpizar and Gsottbauer 2015;Bortoleto et al 2012;Ding et al 2021). A range of attitudinal and value dimensions has been found to explain differences in packaging recycling behaviour.…”
Section: Packaging Recyclementioning
confidence: 99%