Research on the Influence of Stiffness of Copolymer(N-Tert-octylacrylamide/Acrylic acid/Methyl methacrylate/Butylaminoethyl Methacrylate/Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate) by Methyl Methacrylate and N-Tert-Octylacrylamide

Zhu, Jing; Xiao, Weng Fa; Dong, Li Tao; Teng, Fei

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.557-559.968

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is imperative because a predominantly weak associative effect would not necessarily guarantee the needed rheological impact in terms of recovery efficiency even if polymer injectivity is not affected. (Pu and Xu, 2009) Gudong HPAM 68.0 3022 (Zhijian et al, 1998) Bohai Bay HPAM 65.0 6070 (Mogollon and Lokhandwala, 2013) Xing Long Tai HPAM 56.6 3112 (Zhang et al, 1999) Bohai oil field HAPAM 65.0 32423 (Han et al, 2006) Henan oil field HPAM 75.0 5060 (Chen et al, 1998) Shengli HPAM 70.0 10000 (Gao, 2014) USA Cambridge Minnelusa PAM 55.6 Not specified (Vargo et al, 2000) Tambaredjo HPAM 36.0 Not Specified (Mogollon and Lokhandwala, 2013) Tanner PAM 80.0 66800 (P) a (Pitts et al, 2006) West Khiel HPAM 57.0 46,480 (P) a (Meyers et al, 1992) Canada Pelican HPAM 23.0 6800 (Mogollon and Lokhandwala, 2013) David pool PAM 31.0 6660 (I) b (Pitts et al, 2004 (Algi and Okay, 2014;Fang et al, 2016) 2-vinylnaphtahlene (Zeng et al, 2002) Methacrylic Acid (Fernyhough et al, 2009;Bang et al, 2017) N-vinylpyrrolidinone (Taghizadeh and Foroutan, 2004;Willersinn and Schmidt, 2017) 4-vinylbenzenesulfonate (Kang et al, 2015) 2-Acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid (Çavuş, 2010;Kundakci et al, 2011) Methyl methacrylate (Cilurzo et al, 2014;Khromiak et al, 2018) Poly(propylene glycol) methacrylate (Shemper et al, 2002) Sodium vinylsulfonate (Mori et al, 2010;Mori et al, 2012) Carboxymethyl cellulose (Han et al, 2010;Han et al, 2013) N-phenylacrylamide (Zhou and Lai, 2004) N-tert-Octylacrylamide (Zhu et al, 2012) N-dodecylacrylamide…”

Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hydrophobically associating polymers for enhanced oil recovery – Part A: A review on the effects of some key reservoir conditions

Afolabi

Oluyemi

Officer

et al. 2019

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research advancement in polymer flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) has been growing over the last decade. This growth can be tied to increased funding towards the development of superior polymers such as hydrophobically associating polymers when oil prices were high and increasing concern that "easy oil" has been exploited with the focus now on "difficult to extract" oil. The use of hydrophobically associating polymers for EOR was discussed along with its limitations. In this context, the improved rheological properties of associating polymers cannot only be linked to the molecular structures arising from different synthesis methods. Equally, external parameters similar to conditions of oil reservoirs affect the rheological properties of these polymers. As such, this review placed critical emphasis on the molecular architecture of the polymer and the synthesis route and this was linked to the observed rheological properties. In addition, the influence of some key oilfield parameters such as temperature, salinity, pH, and reservoir heterogeneity on the rheological behaviour of hydrophobically associating polymers were reviewed. In this respect, the various findings garnered in understanding the correlation between polymer rheological properties and oilfield parameters were critically reviewed. For associating polymers, an understanding of the molecular architecture (and hence the synthesis method) is crucial for its successful design. However, this must be theoretically linked to the preferred EOR application requirements (based on oilfield parameters).

show abstract