2023
DOI: 10.32604/ee.2022.022122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the MPPT of Photovoltaic Power Generation Based on the CSA-INC Algorithm

Abstract: The existing Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) method has low tracking efficiency and poor stability. It is easy to fall into the Local Maximum Power Point (LMPP) in Partial Shading Condition (PSC), resulting in the degradation of output power quality and efficiency. It was found that various bio-inspired MPPT based optimization algorithms employ different mechanisms, and their performance in tracking the Global Maximum Power Point (GMPP) varies. Thus, a Cuckoo search algorithm (CSA) combined with the Increm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to comprehensively and further compare the performance of the proposed algorithm, we also conducted a comparative analysis with two additional hybrid algorithms, the PSO-P&O hybrid method proposed in the literature [15] and the CSA-INC hybrid method proposed in the literature [21].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to comprehensively and further compare the performance of the proposed algorithm, we also conducted a comparative analysis with two additional hybrid algorithms, the PSO-P&O hybrid method proposed in the literature [15] and the CSA-INC hybrid method proposed in the literature [21].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of its key features is that it does not require specific problem information, but rather compares the advantages and disadvantages of potential solutions to achieve the global optimal value within the population. There have been limited studies on the application of the CSA and ABC to the GMPPT, with most focusing on separately improving these two algorithms or combining them with traditional MPPT control algorithms, such as the combination of the CSA with INC [21] or ABC with P&O [22]; there is a scarcity of research that directly combines the CSA and ABC, and the relevant literature shows that the hybrid approach can improve system performance [23]. To choose a suitable combination method, we need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of each method and combine the strengths of each method to achieve better results [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The INC method typically employs a fixed step size for maximal power point tracking, which does not meet the requirements for tracking speed and precision [23]. The selection of step size for a PV system is always inversely proportional to the search speed and precision of the MPP [23].…”
Section: The Variable Step-size Inc Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The INC method typically employs a fixed step size for maximal power point tracking, which does not meet the requirements for tracking speed and precision [23]. The selection of step size for a PV system is always inversely proportional to the search speed and precision of the MPP [23]. For sake of reconciling the disparity between tracking speed and steady-state precision, the search area may be subdivided into distinct regions with corresponding step sizes [24].…”
Section: The Variable Step-size Inc Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%