Research on the Problems and Countermeasures in the Review of Constitutionality about Normative Documents in China

Abstract

There are still some problems hindering the development of the "constitutionality review" system. First, whether 
 the objects of the constitutionality review include laws enacted by the National People's Congress and its Standing Committee 
 (NPCSC);Second, when reviewing normative documents, legality review is often superior to constitutionality review. Third, the 
 single use of "Internal communication mode" to deal with the consequences of constitutional review will hinder the implementation 
 of constitutional responsibility. In view of the above problems, the analysis and countermeasures should be suggested:first, the 
 laws enacted by the NPCSC are not within the scope of constitutional review and must be cleared; Secondly, the establishment of 
 the standard of "constitutionality review" is helpful to make the constitutionality review superior to the legality review in specific 
 cases.[1] Finally, reference constitutional cases should be developed to help review authorities strictly enforce unconstitutional 
 responsibilities, rather than just using "internal communication models".

An Empirical Study on Individual Differences of Chinese Students at Hungarian Universities: English Learning Motivation, Strategies and Autonomy in a StudyAbroad Context

“…The research into the autonomy of Chinese students is generally concentrated on the following aspects: approaches to improving autonomous learning ability, the role of teachers in autonomous learning contexts, the beliefs and awareness of autonomous learning ability, and the factors affecting autonomous learning, such as self-efficacy, causal attribution, learning strategies, learning motivation, learning styles, etc. (Xu & Zhan, 2004;Yin, 2014;Ma & Zhu, 2011;Bai, 2010).…”