2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-017-9500-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the relation the characteristics of the faculty and the commitment to continuous improvement of motivations and student study processes

Abstract: This study focused on China's higher education system and explored if personality traits were a mediator of the relationship between motivational mechanisms and continuous improvement, and further explored if leadership change was a moderator of the relationship between personality traits and continuous improvement of the motivations and student study processes. In this paper, partial least squares (PLS) was the primary methodology used to test mediation and moderation. This study analysed 350 samples even tho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is important to know whether mobile learning system has a positive impact as expected. In this study the researchers adopted the IS success model [14,15], combined with the two learning aspects (i.e., learning contents and motivation of the learning participant) [2,16,17], and then adapted it in terms of mobile learning context [18][19][20][21][22]. The researchers assumed, despite the success model is the popular model for assessing IS performance among in the IS research field; of course, the model may also need to be extended referring to the research context.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is important to know whether mobile learning system has a positive impact as expected. In this study the researchers adopted the IS success model [14,15], combined with the two learning aspects (i.e., learning contents and motivation of the learning participant) [2,16,17], and then adapted it in terms of mobile learning context [18][19][20][21][22]. The researchers assumed, despite the success model is the popular model for assessing IS performance among in the IS research field; of course, the model may also need to be extended referring to the research context.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TGT spirit is that the success of the team depends on the success of individual members, whose learning is enhanced through the establishment of a tournament for mutual competition and growth, enabling students to demonstrate their concentration and active participation [46]. As stated by Wodarski and Feit [47], and Chen and Chen [48], TGT provides students with the opportunity to interact with their peers while learning, and the improvement of the incentive mechanism has a positive impact on the motivation of continuous improvement and students' learning process. If viewed according to the motivation theory model by Pintrich [49], individuals who are oriented toward goals and have higher expectations for success are more likely to be engaged in their work and persist rather than give up when they encounter difficulties.…”
Section: Impact Of Tgt On Pe Learning Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, Subiyakto's [39,40] information system readiness and success (ISRS) model was adopted and adapted in the context of u-learning implementation performance ( Figure 1) in terms of continuous model development [41,42]. The model itself was developed by combining Delone and McLean's [43] IS success (ISS) model and Parasuraman and Colby's [25] technology readiness index (TRI) model [39,40].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%