2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/3138258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the Stability Evaluation Model of Composite Support Pillar in Backfill-Strip Mining

Abstract: Backfill-strip mining, which combines the advantages of strip mining and backfill mining, is proposed to overcome high cost and shortage of filling materials in coal mines at present. The composite support pillar (CSP) is a combined support pillar of the filling body and coal pillar for supporting the overlying strata and achieving subsidence control. The stability of CSP is the key to the success of subsidence control in backfill-strip mining engineering. A stability evaluation model of the CSP mechanical mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e width of filling working face and coal pillar is also different according to the different filling materials. Zhu [27] divides the stable CSP into three types, namely, Type I, Type II, and Type III CSP, and using the elastic-plastic theory, the calculation method of the minimum residual coal pillar and the width of the backfilling working face under the stable condition of different types of CSP is presented. e residual coal pillars in Type I CSP are wide (Figure 3).…”
Section: Safety Width Calculation Of the Residual Coal Pillar And Backfilling Working Face In Backfill-strip Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e width of filling working face and coal pillar is also different according to the different filling materials. Zhu [27] divides the stable CSP into three types, namely, Type I, Type II, and Type III CSP, and using the elastic-plastic theory, the calculation method of the minimum residual coal pillar and the width of the backfilling working face under the stable condition of different types of CSP is presented. e residual coal pillars in Type I CSP are wide (Figure 3).…”
Section: Safety Width Calculation Of the Residual Coal Pillar And Backfilling Working Face In Backfill-strip Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to monitor the pressure change of the filling body [13][14][15][16], filling body pressure monitoring gauges were installed, respectively, at a distance of 0. As shown in Figure 6, within the range of 0-18.5 m behind the working face, the pressure on the filling body due to the flexible formwork concrete near roadway increased rapidly, from 141 t at 0.3 m to 275 t at 0.6 m. Consequently, the filling body pressure gauge failed to monitor at 0.3 m due to the pipeline damage.…”
Section: Filling Body Pressure Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long time, the main mining method of coal under villages is strip mining, which alleviates the problem of "three under" pressed coal to a certain extent. Many scholars have done a lot of research on strip mining [18][19][20][21][22]. However, the strip mining still faces some problems: first, the coal recovery rate is low, and nearly 50% of the strip coal pillars are left in the underground, which causes a lot of waste of resources and is not conducive to the sustainable development of the coal industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%