2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on thermal hydraulic behavior of small-break LOCAs in AP1000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the beginning, the NOTRUMP flowrate appears higher that the RELAP5, which might be caused by the differences in the loss coefficient of the break model. At the start of DVI break, only liquid flow discharges from the downcomer occurs, to be followed by steam flow as the void fraction in the core increases [18], as shown by NOTRUMP calculation results. That phenomenon (differences in the liquid and vapor phase of break flow) can not be shown in the present RELAP5 model.…”
Section: Transient Simulationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the beginning, the NOTRUMP flowrate appears higher that the RELAP5, which might be caused by the differences in the loss coefficient of the break model. At the start of DVI break, only liquid flow discharges from the downcomer occurs, to be followed by steam flow as the void fraction in the core increases [18], as shown by NOTRUMP calculation results. That phenomenon (differences in the liquid and vapor phase of break flow) can not be shown in the present RELAP5 model.…”
Section: Transient Simulationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the natural circulation phase, the prediction results of development model 43 are the lowest, and the prediction result of development model 50 is slightly higher than the base model. Compared with the results of other researchers, 26,27 the activation of the development model 43 may cause deviations for the prediction of critical mass flow in the natural circulation phase. In the later phase of the accident, the activation of development model 50 may produce unreasonable oscillation.…”
Section: Model Application Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…e typical advanced passive plant has been originated from AP600/AP1000 which adopts PCCS design [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Wang et al simulated and analyzed cold leg (CL) small-break LOCAs for AP1000 using RELAP5/MOD3.4 codes, including 2-inch, 4-inch, and 8-inch breaks, and the peak cladding temperatures during the process could meet the safety criterion [14][15][16][17]. Di Giuli et al modeled all the PCCS for the AP1000 and studied a 10-inch small-break LOCA scenario using CESAR codes; when compared to the Westinghouse-developed NOTRUMP code as reference showing a reasonable agreement [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%