Research patterns and trends of Recommendation System in China using co-word analysis

Hu, Jiming; Zhang, Yin

doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2015.02.002

Cited by 110 publications

(71 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, it is a technique that outlines the intellectual structure of a field by analyzing the relationship between words in various sections of a document (i.e., the title, abstract, keywords, etc. ), using various indexes and mapping subdomains (Callon et al, 1983;Hu & Zhang, 2015;Ravikumar, Agrahari, & Singh, 2015;Whittaker, 1989).…”

Section: Co-word Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If two keywords expressing a particular research topic appear simultaneously in the same document, those two words have a certain semantic relationship (I.E. Co-Word or Co-Occurrence) (Yang et al 2012;Hu & Zhang, 2015;Khasseh et al 2017) and they correlate with each other (Cho, 2014). The frequency of the co-occurrence of keywords implies the strength of the relationship between them (Chen, Chen, Wu, Xie, & Li, 2016;Ding et al, 2001;Feng et al, 2017).…”

Section: Co-word Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Exploring the conceptual structure of the auditing discipline through co‐word analysis: An international perspective

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to explore the conceptual structure of the auditing discipline between 2000 and 2016, by synthesizing keywords cited in 2,119 articles published in 24 accounting and auditing journals, using co-word analysis and social network analysis (SNA). We aimed to highlight dominant, fading, and emerging themes in the discipline across the periods and across continents. The main outputs of this study can be summarized as follows. The consistent decline in fragmentation, and the increase in connectedness, within the SNA showed that the auditing discipline became an increasingly tight and more cohesive network. While the generic keywords auditing and auditor were used far less frequently in the final period of the study, the keywords audit quality, audit fees, internal control, financial reporting quality, and continuous auditing were increasingly cited across the study periods. Moreover, regional analyzes unveiled similarities and differences between territories.

show abstract

Section: Co-word Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Co-word Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the conceptual structure of the auditing discipline through co‐word analysis: An international perspective

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Table 2 lists the 60 most used terms, with a total of 2219 co-occurrence frequencies, which accounts for more than 75% of all keyword frequencies. "Green building" and its synonyms used for searching publications are excluded as they comprise a large proportion and provide general background information [66], and therefore there is no additional value in analyzing these words. Moreover, not all the keywords provided by the authors are normalised; thus, the extracted keywords are standardized to ensure the consistent treatment of unifying synonyms.…”

Section: Keyword Co-occurrence Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping Knowledge in the Economic Areas of Green Building Using Scientometric Analysis

Xue

Skitmore

et al. 2019

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the first inclusive scientometric review of the economic areas of green building (GBE). The aim is to methodically examine and summarize the state-of-the-art of the GBE body of knowledge. To this end, this study analyses 1713 GBE-related bibliographic records retrieved from the Web of Science by using the quantitative method of knowledge mapping. The knowledge base, knowledge domain, and knowledge evolution of how they interacted with each other are explored using document co-citation analysis and keywords co-citation analysis of the existing body of literature. The research findings are informative in recognizing and interpreting the underlying structure and trends in GBE. A knowledge map provides a valuable and instructive understanding of the evolution and status quo of the GBE knowledge body, as well as assisting in recognizing the gaps and deficiencies involved. The results will help in understanding how GBE knowledge is evolving and its role played in green building, and thus provide suggestions of how academic research can enhance sustainability practices in terms of economic area in the future.

show abstract

“…Co-word analysis has been widely applied in many fields, such as Internet of Things (IoT) (Yan et al, 2015), nanotechnology research (Darvish and Tonta, 2015), 3D printing (Wang et al, 2015) and economic transition (Topalli and Ivanaj, 2016). Using co-word network analysis can capture the current status and trends of research themes (Hu and Zhang, 2015). A co-word analysis based on the keywords and thematic noun-phrases in the titles and abstracts of the sample papers was used to explore the hot research topics in the top five journals.…”

Section: Co-word Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top Five Economics Journals During 2012–2016

Wei

2018

Journal of Economic Surveys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the top five economics journals during the period 2012–2016 and provides helpful insights into the document types, the distribution of country/territories, the distribution of institutions, the geographical distribution of authors, the most active authors and their research interests or fields, the co‐authorship network, and global/local cooperation. This paper also provides valuable information about the core historical references and the hottest new papers through co‐citation analysis and citation analysis. A co‐word analysis based on the keywords and thematic noun‐phrases in the titles and abstracts of the sample papers was used to explore the hot research topics in the top five journals (e.g. ‘price’, ‘game’, ‘consumption’, ‘income’, ‘international trade’, ‘employment’, ‘monetary policy’, ‘welfare effects’ and ‘developing countries’). In addition, a comparative keyword analysis was used to explore the differences in the directions and characteristics of each journal and the changes in research focuses between ‘new’ and ‘old’ studies. The analytical methods of this study differ from those of reviews or previous studies, and the results fill the gaps not covered by those works.

show abstract

Research patterns and trends of Recommendation System in China using co-word analysis

Cited by 110 publications

References 25 publications

Exploring the conceptual structure of the auditing discipline through co‐word analysis: An international perspective

Exploring the conceptual structure of the auditing discipline through co‐word analysis: An international perspective

Mapping Knowledge in the Economic Areas of Green Building Using Scientometric Analysis

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top Five Economics Journals During 2012–2016

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About