2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 1: Clinical Versus Statistical Significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
237
3
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
237
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The time taken to return to this level varied between 5 and 12 months from the date of surgery; 93% of patients (n ¼ 65) improved their subjective IKDC score beyond the minimal clinically important difference value (16.7), and 97% (n ¼ 68) of patients have a final IKDC score superior to the patient acceptable symptom state value. 21 All patients improved their Lysholm score over the MDC value (8.9). The Tegner score was lower than the preoperative one without statistical significance, and 61 patients (87%) have a difference lower or equal to the Tegner minimum detectable change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The time taken to return to this level varied between 5 and 12 months from the date of surgery; 93% of patients (n ¼ 65) improved their subjective IKDC score beyond the minimal clinically important difference value (16.7), and 97% (n ¼ 68) of patients have a final IKDC score superior to the patient acceptable symptom state value. 21 All patients improved their Lysholm score over the MDC value (8.9). The Tegner score was lower than the preoperative one without statistical significance, and 61 patients (87%) have a difference lower or equal to the Tegner minimum detectable change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Despite the observation of statistically significant differences between pretreatment and posttreatments, a patient may or may not be capable of sensing those differences. 25 The smallest detectable change and minimal important change in KOOS activities of daily living were 15.7 and 18.4, respectively. In the current study, the difference in means between ACI and MF was 5.03 at 5-year follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Mean Lysholm score improved significantly from 55.9 (standard deviation 11.4) to 91.2 (standard deviation 7.6) (power ¼ 1.00 and P < .001). Since the minimum detectable change of Lysholm score was 8.9, 16 all the 10 patients met minimum detectable change. There were no complications such as infections.…”
Section: Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%