2003
DOI: 10.1023/b:educ.0000006169.86495.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research, practice and theory in didactics of mathematics: Towards dialogue between different fields

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Acknowledging the complex relationships which the field of didactics of mathematics has with other research fields (e.g. mathematics, educational sciences, epistemology, history, psychology, semiotics, sociology, cognitive science), the authors analyze in this paper some cases of fruitful and of some failed dialogue between experts of the different fields. They discuss results of these dialogues, drawing on research studies carried out by the authors, within the paradigm of the Italian research in Ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, in a sense, historical research is moving away from a monolithic image of mathematics. Bartolini-Bussi and Bazzini (2003) describe also the problematic relationship between historians and didacticians. In some cases mathematics educators consider history as a solution of the problem of involving students in mathematics, thus the transposition into classrooms was carried out mainly relying on the glamour and neglecting a careful set up of methodologies and objectives.…”
Section: A Denser Geometric Progressionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…So, in a sense, historical research is moving away from a monolithic image of mathematics. Bartolini-Bussi and Bazzini (2003) describe also the problematic relationship between historians and didacticians. In some cases mathematics educators consider history as a solution of the problem of involving students in mathematics, thus the transposition into classrooms was carried out mainly relying on the glamour and neglecting a careful set up of methodologies and objectives.…”
Section: A Denser Geometric Progressionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, research objects in mathematics education are characterized by a high level of complexity, which is due to the interdisciplinary nature of the discipline (Wittmann 1995;Bartolini-Bussi and Bazzini 2003). Furthermore, the objects studied are characterized by different intra-or interpersonal relationships on micro (individual), meso (e.g., group, class, school) and macro level (e.g., country level or educational system).…”
Section: Special Features Of Mmr In Mathematics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(School) Practice and (content-related educational) science need to be seen as two relatively autonomous institutions and fields of work, between which there are no direct possibilities of influence or change (see about this Bartolini-Bussi & Bazzini, 2003;Krainer, 2003;Scherer & Steinbring, 2006;Steinbring, 1994Steinbring, , 1998a. Each of the two fields is subject to its own expectations and aims, as well as to system-internal requirements and norms, which cannot be invalidated from the outside in order to apparently be able to directly interfere into and to purposefully regulate within the other field.…”
Section: Mathematics Education Research and Mathematicalmentioning
confidence: 99%