Research productivity of library scholars

Jabeen, Munazza; Liu, Yun; Rafiq, Muhammad; Jabeen, Misbah

doi:10.1108/nlw-11-2014-0132

Cited by 18 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One of the important features of these studies was the use of visualization tools in the research. The studies were mainly focused on the productivity and collaboration patterns among LIS professionals in China (Ahmad et al, 2018;Jabeen et al, 2015Jabeen et al, , 2016Jabeen et al, , 2017. Naseer and Mahmood (2014) conducted a comprehensive study of LIS subject dispersion.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Library and information science research in Pakistan: A bibliometric analysis, 1957–2018

Siddique

Rehman²,

Khan

et al. 2020

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reviews 62 years (1957–2018) of research in library and information science in Pakistan. A comprehensive bibliometric study was conducted using the four leading databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Library and Information Science Abstracts, and Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts). The researchers found a positive upward trend. Library research is on the rise in Pakistan. The Department of Information Management at the University of the Punjab is the major contributor to the library and information science literature. Forty percent of the total publications were published in two Pakistani journals. Older and well-established institutions like the University of the Punjab and the University of Karachi have taken the lead in publishing research. The Baluchistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces require more focus and funding.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Library and information science research in Pakistan: A bibliometric analysis, 1957–2018

Siddique

Rehman²,

Khan

et al. 2020

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The bibliometric analysis studies usually aim to identify the trends in a particular topic (Jabeen et al, 2015) and journal (Kolle et al, 2015). Figure 1 (Majid et al, 2015).…”

Section: Publication Outputsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global research on information literacy: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2014

Kolle

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature published on information literacy (IL) from 2005 to 2014 and reveal the key aspects of IL publication trends. Design/methodology/approach The study analyses the literature indexed in Web of Science database on IL from 2005 to 2014 and used the required bibliometric measures to analyse specific aspects of publishing trends. Findings The findings of the study reveal that increase in literature on IL from 2005 to 2014 was noticed. A high amount of annual growth of literature on IL is observed for the year of 2007, 2008 and 2011. “Pinto, M” and the “University of Granada, Spain” was productive author and institute. Journal of Academic Librarianship was the most productive journal, with 97 articles being published for the period. USA was the most contributing country. “Digital divide”, “media literacy”, “pedagogy”, “higher education” and “critical thinking” were current research topics in the IL domain. Originality/value The paper is very useful for researchers to learn about trends in the literature on IL, as well as possible areas for further research, and it provides the names of the most productive authors, organizations and countries, along with the most popular IL keywords.

show abstract

“…The authors adopted citation and co citation analysis and able to recognize growth, significant papers and various business ethics schools. Jabeen et al 9…”

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Global Activity, Impact and Collaborative Trends of Business Research – A Bibliometric Research

2019

IJEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An analysis of global publication productivity, impact and trend of collaborations in business research using Scopus database during the period 1998-2017 is presented. Bibliometric techniques are used for analysis of data. This study finds, 2016 and 2017 as productive and collaborative, whereas 2005, 2007 and 2006 as highly cited years. Collaborative papers are above 50% and Kasemsap, K. is the most productive author and all his papers are single authored. Hong Kong Polytechnic University of China has greater productivity, Collaborative papers and second highest citations gained. United States and United Kingdom leads for their productivity and citations received but their collaborative efforts are less than 50%. India has 7th position with 1538 (3.11%) publication share. Journal of Business Ethics is the highest productive journal. Harvard Business Review is the highly cited journal. Porter, M. E. is the highly cited author having 3389 citations for his single contribution. Out of top 10 highly cited papers six are single authored.

show abstract

Research productivity of library scholars

Cited by 18 publications

References 33 publications

Library and information science research in Pakistan: A bibliometric analysis, 1957–2018

Library and information science research in Pakistan: A bibliometric analysis, 1957–2018

Global research on information literacy: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2014

Global Activity, Impact and Collaborative Trends of Business Research – A Bibliometric Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About