2024
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1291969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research progress of vascularization strategies of tissue-engineered bone

Nanning Lv,
Zhangzhe Zhou,
Mingzhuang Hou
et al.

Abstract: The bone defect caused by fracture, bone tumor, infection, and other causes is not only a problematic point in clinical treatment but also one of the hot issues in current research. The development of bone tissue engineering provides a new way to repair bone defects. Many animal experimental and rising clinical application studies have shown their excellent application prospects. The construction of rapid vascularization of tissue-engineered bone is the main bottleneck and critical factor in repairing bone def… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To begin with, the mechanical properties of NFMS, while superior to many biomaterial-based platforms, may not match the robustness of traditional, rigid scaffolds (such as those made from metal or ceramic materials) . NFMS typically exhibit lower compressive and tensile strengths due to their polymeric and fibrous nature, which can limit their use in high load-bearing applications where high mechanical integrity is crucial. , Second, the microscale size of NFMS can pose challenges in achieving adequate vascularization and integration with host tissue, especially in large defects . The size and porosity of NFMS, though ideal for cellular interactions and nutrient diffusion at the microscale, may not provide sufficient macroscale architecture necessary to support new tissue growth and vascular network formation across larger spans of bone defects .…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To begin with, the mechanical properties of NFMS, while superior to many biomaterial-based platforms, may not match the robustness of traditional, rigid scaffolds (such as those made from metal or ceramic materials) . NFMS typically exhibit lower compressive and tensile strengths due to their polymeric and fibrous nature, which can limit their use in high load-bearing applications where high mechanical integrity is crucial. , Second, the microscale size of NFMS can pose challenges in achieving adequate vascularization and integration with host tissue, especially in large defects . The size and porosity of NFMS, though ideal for cellular interactions and nutrient diffusion at the microscale, may not provide sufficient macroscale architecture necessary to support new tissue growth and vascular network formation across larger spans of bone defects .…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 187 , 188 Second, the microscale size of NFMS can pose challenges in achieving adequate vascularization and integration with host tissue, especially in large defects. 189 The size and porosity of NFMS, though ideal for cellular interactions and nutrient diffusion at the microscale, may not provide sufficient macroscale architecture necessary to support new tissue growth and vascular network formation across larger spans of bone defects. 190 Also, it is challenging to control the degradation rate of NFMS to match the rate of new bone formation.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%