2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.476412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research progress on a focal plane array ladar system using a laser diode transmitter and FM/cw radar principles

Abstract: The Army Research Laboratory is developing scannerless ladar systems for smart munition and reconnaissance applications. Here we report on progress attained over the past year related to the construction of a 32x32 pixel ladar. The 32x32 pixel architecture achieves ranging based on a frequency modulation/continuous wave (FM/cw) technique implemented by directly amplitude modulating a near-IR diode laser transmitter with a radio frequency (rf) subcarrier that is linearly frequency modulated. The diode's output … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This statement was made for shorter wavelength systems, but applies almost equally well to current developmental ladars at eye-safe wavelengths, since several watts of optical power is utilized. In one system, the total design optical power was 9.6 W or more.3 and in another a two-watt diode laser was used as a transmitter and an image intensifier tube as a demodulating receiver and according to Stann et al 3 "ladar did not perform as well as expected". This clearly compromises our eye-safety concern.…”
Section: Scanning Vs "Flash" Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statement was made for shorter wavelength systems, but applies almost equally well to current developmental ladars at eye-safe wavelengths, since several watts of optical power is utilized. In one system, the total design optical power was 9.6 W or more.3 and in another a two-watt diode laser was used as a transmitter and an image intensifier tube as a demodulating receiver and according to Stann et al 3 "ladar did not perform as well as expected". This clearly compromises our eye-safety concern.…”
Section: Scanning Vs "Flash" Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%