2023
DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10080491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Progress on the Development of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Vaccines

Hang Zhang,
Qin Luo,
Yingxin He
et al.

Abstract: Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is a highly contagious disease in the pig industry, but its pathogenesis is not yet fully understood. The disease is caused by the PRRS virus (PRRSV), which primarily infects porcine alveolar macrophages and disrupts the immune system. Unfortunately, there is no specific drug to cure PRRS, so vaccination is crucial for controlling the disease. There are various types of single and combined vaccines available, including live, inactivated, subunit, DNA, and ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The commercially available MLVs vaccines fail to provide sufficient heterologous protection, as they typically induce weak innate and humoral responses, and inadequate T cell responses [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. For instance, the antibody protection following vaccination is low and may result in antibody-dependent enhancement, facilitating virus entry [ 27 ]. Inactivated virus vaccines have shown poor efficacy, such as poor immune effects on heterologous strains, a lack of detectable PRRSV-specific antibody production, and an absence of a cell-mediated immune response [ 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The commercially available MLVs vaccines fail to provide sufficient heterologous protection, as they typically induce weak innate and humoral responses, and inadequate T cell responses [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. For instance, the antibody protection following vaccination is low and may result in antibody-dependent enhancement, facilitating virus entry [ 27 ]. Inactivated virus vaccines have shown poor efficacy, such as poor immune effects on heterologous strains, a lack of detectable PRRSV-specific antibody production, and an absence of a cell-mediated immune response [ 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the antibody protection following vaccination is low and may result in antibody-dependent enhancement, facilitating virus entry [ 27 ]. Inactivated virus vaccines have shown poor efficacy, such as poor immune effects on heterologous strains, a lack of detectable PRRSV-specific antibody production, and an absence of a cell-mediated immune response [ 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. The high genetic and antigenic diversity presents a significant impediment to developing an effective vaccine to control PRRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These vaccines provide limited protection against homologous strains and little or no protection against heterologous strains, which are circulating and mutating in the field [10]. For instance, the antibody protection following vaccination is low and may result in antibody-dependent enhancement, facilitating virus entry [11]. The high genetic and antigenic diversity presents a significant impediment to developing an effective vaccine to control PRRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge of effectively preventing and controlling PRRS is a major bottleneck in healthy swine breeding today (2). Different regions employ various strategies for PRRS management; for instance, the European Union and the United States focus on biosecurity measures (3), whereas China and other countries rely on vaccination strategies (4). Although PRRS vaccines, including live and inactivated versions, do not offer universal protection against all strains, they are crucial in controlling the disease (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%