2017
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Review: Cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta‐analysis

Abstract: In contrast to previous meta-analytic findings, our results indicate that CBM-I has potential but weak anxiolytic effects in youth. Our findings suggest that it may be premature to disregard the potential value of CBM-I research and further research in this field is warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
58
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
8
58
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that a single session of interpretation training can reduce the frequency of negative interpretations and increase the frequency of positive interpretations is consistent with previous studies, mostly conducted with healthy/unselected samples of adolescents (Krebs et al 2018) and more recently with adolescents diagnosed with major depression disorder (LeMoult et al 2018). Also, in line with these studies, is the finding that effects on selfreported measures (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding that a single session of interpretation training can reduce the frequency of negative interpretations and increase the frequency of positive interpretations is consistent with previous studies, mostly conducted with healthy/unselected samples of adolescents (Krebs et al 2018) and more recently with adolescents diagnosed with major depression disorder (LeMoult et al 2018). Also, in line with these studies, is the finding that effects on selfreported measures (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In clinical populations, these paradigms have been found to reduce negative interpretation and attention biases towards depression-and anxiety-specific stimuli with a moderate effect (Hedges' g = 0.49) (Hallion and Ruscio 2011). More recently, a meta-analysis of cognitive bias modification studies for interpretation bias in children and adolescents has shown moderate effects for changing a negative interpretation bias (Hedges' g = .77) and a small effect size for reducing anxiety levels post training (Hedges' g = .21; Krebs et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective and ineffective WIs did not show apparent differences in the types of psychopathology they addressed, the settings in which they were administered, or their delivery systems (self-versus therapist-administered); WIs identified as both helpful and unhelpful varied widely along all of these dimensions. However, certain types of WIs, such as cognitive interpretation and cognitive bias modification, showed limited or mixed efficacy across multiple studies, suggesting that certain approaches may have limitations in influencing youth mental health outcomes (the broader literature on CBM for youths and adults, including multi-session CBM and CBM combined with other therapeutic approaches, is similarly mixed: (Jones & Sharpe, 2017;Krebs et al, 2018). However, several…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis and review, which both focused on mental health outcomes other than hostile attributions, suggested that CBM interventions typically are (moderately) effective to reduce cognitive bias, but less so to change behavioral outcomes (Cristea et al 2015;Krebs et al 2017). Although this work primarily focused on anxiety and depression outcomes, it begs the question of how readily potential effects on hostile attribution bias will generalize to reducing aggression, especially in clinically referred children.…”
Section: Intervening With Hostile Attributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%