Research status and hotspots of patient engagement: A bibliometric analysis

Man, Chunxia; Liu, Tiantian; Yan, Suying; Xie, Qing; Liu, Hua

doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108306

Patient Education and Counseling

2024

DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108306

|View full text |Cite

Research status and hotspots of patient engagement: A bibliometric analysis

Chunxia Man,

Tiantian Liu,

Suying Yan

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Top 100 most cited articles on Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREM): insights and perspectives

Attar,

Shukla,

Mulay

2024

J Patient Rep Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Patient experience is fundamental to Patient-Centered Care (PCC). Although prior bibliometric research studies have focused on various aspects of PCC, a comprehensive analysis of PREM articles is required to understand its impact on the clinical practices. This study aims to analyze the top 100 most-cited PREM articles to examine the critical studies and related trends. Methods The 100 most cited articles on PREM were gathered from the Web of Science using a combination keyword search approach. The following information was extracted: study design, sample size, topic, number of citations, authorship, country, year of publication, journal title, and dimensions included in these PREM instruments. The VOSviewer software was used to generate graphical bibliometric networks. Results The citation count of the top 100 PREM articles varied from 20 to 775 citations. 21 articles had received a minimum of 100 citations. All the articles were in English, and out of these 45% were from the USA. The cross-sectional study (69%) was the most common study design, and the impact of treatment (44%) was the most frequent topic. The common PREM instruments used were customized PREM questionnaires (16%) and HCAHPS (10%). Conclusion This bibliometric research showed that the area of PREM is far from being saturated. The authors have attempted to provide an overview of global PREM research. Future research should focus on studies from underdeveloped and developing countries to develop condition–specific PREM tools. Longitudinal researches among special populations and studies in day-care and outpatient settings are recommended in future.

show abstract

Top 100 most cited articles on Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREM): insights and perspectives

Attar,

Shukla,

Mulay

2024

J Patient Rep Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Research status and hotspots of patient engagement: A bibliometric analysis

Cited by 1 publication

References 74 publications

Top 100 most cited articles on Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREM): insights and perspectives

Top 100 most cited articles on Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREM): insights and perspectives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About