2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research status on remediation of eutrophic water by submerged macrophytes: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to anthropogenic influences and climate change, eutrophication of lakes and rivers is becoming an increasingly severe global environmental challenge (Geng et al, 2022;Xu et al, 2023). Data from the United States Environmental Protection Agency indicates that 46% of lakes in the United States exceed acceptable levels of nitrogen (N) and 45% exceed acceptable levels of phosphorus (P) (D. Wang et al, 2023). Furthermore, approximately 53% of lakes in Europe, 48% in North America, 41% in South America, and 28% in Africa are impacted by water eutrophication, while 54% of Asian lakes face eutrophication issues (Nyenje et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to anthropogenic influences and climate change, eutrophication of lakes and rivers is becoming an increasingly severe global environmental challenge (Geng et al, 2022;Xu et al, 2023). Data from the United States Environmental Protection Agency indicates that 46% of lakes in the United States exceed acceptable levels of nitrogen (N) and 45% exceed acceptable levels of phosphorus (P) (D. Wang et al, 2023). Furthermore, approximately 53% of lakes in Europe, 48% in North America, 41% in South America, and 28% in Africa are impacted by water eutrophication, while 54% of Asian lakes face eutrophication issues (Nyenje et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical methods (e.g., sediment dredging, artificial aeration, and water diversion dilution) are generally applied for severe water pollution because of their easy operation and long-term effectiveness. However, these physical methods are cost-intensive and may cause damage to water ecosystems [7]. Chemical methods (e.g., flocculation, sedimentation, and chemical removal) are applied for emergency disposal in water pollution incidents because of their quick and good effect, low cost, and easy operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical methods (e.g., flocculation, sedimentation, and chemical removal) are applied for emergency disposal in water pollution incidents because of their quick and good effect, low cost, and easy operation. However, chemical methods easily cause secondary pollution and biotoxicity [7]. Compared with physical and chemical methods, biological methods (e.g., phytoremediation, animal and microbial repair) are considered more economical, effective, and environmentally friendly for lake restoration [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations