1977
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb38163.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Strategies in Evaluating the Coercive Power of Hypnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this issue has been the subject of considerable discussion and debate (Conn, 1972;Kline, 1972;Watkins, 1972), properly controlled experiments designed to investigate such possibilities are difficult to carry out for a number of reasons, some of which are obvious and some of which are not so obvious (Levitt, 1977). For instance, if I were to administer a trance induction to a hundred subjects, hand them each a loaded gun, and then order them all to shoot themselves as a test of the coercive power of the trance state being suggested, what conclusions could be drawn if some of the subjects should happen to comply?…”
Section: Administering Trance Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this issue has been the subject of considerable discussion and debate (Conn, 1972;Kline, 1972;Watkins, 1972), properly controlled experiments designed to investigate such possibilities are difficult to carry out for a number of reasons, some of which are obvious and some of which are not so obvious (Levitt, 1977). For instance, if I were to administer a trance induction to a hundred subjects, hand them each a loaded gun, and then order them all to shoot themselves as a test of the coercive power of the trance state being suggested, what conclusions could be drawn if some of the subjects should happen to comply?…”
Section: Administering Trance Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conceptualizing hypnosis the emphasis should be placed on the experiential alterations that occur, since what hypnotized individuals do behaviourally is unimportant except for the fact that their behaviour seems to reflect changes in subjective experience (Sheehan & McConkey, 1982). In this respect, it is useful to note that hypnosis is not an effective means of changing behaviour or of inducing individuals to behave in a way that they are not otherwise motivated and prepared to do (Levitt, 1977;Orne, 1972). Consideration of the finding that hypnosis is effective for some individuals in terms of altering experience but is not particularly effective in directly altering behaviour suggests that the impact of hypnosis as a therapeutic tool may depend on whether the disorder involves experiences that are not under an individual's volitional control or the disorder is one of behavioural self-control (Gruenewald, 1982;Perry, Gelfand, & Marcovitch, 1979;Wadden & Anderton, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%