2019
DOI: 10.1111/iej.13194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research that matters: studies on fatigue of rotary and reciprocating NiTi root canal instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation has gained wide popularity in the endodontic community over the past decades (Bird et al 2009). Whilst there are numerous studies dealing with forces acting on motorized endodontic instruments (Hülsmann 2019), there is little information on the forces these instruments exert on the canal walls and roots (Gambarini et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation has gained wide popularity in the endodontic community over the past decades (Bird et al 2009). Whilst there are numerous studies dealing with forces acting on motorized endodontic instruments (Hülsmann 2019), there is little information on the forces these instruments exert on the canal walls and roots (Gambarini et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have convincingly demonstrated a higher CF resistance of instruments with new alloys and designs; however, low-cost instruments are being incorporated to the market and a lower reliability has been reported to be expected when using such offerings (12,22). We suggest that minimum criterion be implemented for manufacturers to demonstrate the reliable use of new instruments in clinical settings, before marketing a new product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Using this method, it is possible to increase the internal validity and reproducibility test, allowing a better comprehension of the resistance behaviour of the instrument and minimising biases like speed and amplitude movements that, although possible to reproduce in the dynamic model, are, in clinical situations, operator‐dependent (27). Therefore, although some editorials (29,30) present conclusions that criticise such tests' performance, they are still valid and allow the verification of several factors associated with the instruments' performance, such as changes caused by temperature and factors associated with the instrument’s geometrical features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%