2012
DOI: 10.1071/he12016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research to practice: application of an evidencebuilding framework to a childhood obesity prevention initiative in New South Wales

Abstract: The five-stage evidence-building framework helped identify important research and evaluation opportunities that could improve health promotion practice in NSW. More work is needed to determine the validity and reliability of the criteria for rating the extent and quality of the evidence for each stage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By far the most frequently applied knowledge translation framework was the RE-AIM framework developed by Glasgow and colleagues [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] , followed by variants of the knowledge translation continuum models or 'T' models 5-7,11 29-39 , the Knowledge to Action framework 8,9,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44] , the PARiHS framework [45][46][47][48] , the evidence based public health models of Brownson and colleagues 10,[53][54][55][56][57] , and the stages of research and evaluation model of Nutbeam, Bauman and colleagues. [58][59][60][61][62] The four most widely Key elements:…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By far the most frequently applied knowledge translation framework was the RE-AIM framework developed by Glasgow and colleagues [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] , followed by variants of the knowledge translation continuum models or 'T' models 5-7,11 29-39 , the Knowledge to Action framework 8,9,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44] , the PARiHS framework [45][46][47][48] , the evidence based public health models of Brownson and colleagues 10,[53][54][55][56][57] , and the stages of research and evaluation model of Nutbeam, Bauman and colleagues. [58][59][60][61][62] The four most widely Key elements:…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Rissel et al . ). These messages are: (i) Get active each day; (ii) Turn off the TV or computer and get active; (iii) Eat fewer snacks and select healthier alternatives; (iv) Choose water as a drink; and (v) Eat more fruit and vegetables (http://www.healthykids.nsw.gov.au).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, attempts to replicate these programs in other settings has proven particularly challenging. Aarons et al, have recently described these efforts as “scale-out” interventions, where researchers employ the “deliberate use of strategies to implement, test, improve, and sustain an evidence based intervention as it is delivered to new populations and/or through new delivery systems that differ from those in effectiveness trials.” [ 8 ] With the burden of childhood obesity now affecting 17% of children in the United States [ 9 ], the future of obesity research needs to include rigorous methods for “scaling-out” efficacious studies into real-world contexts and evaluating their impact [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community-based implementation research is an emerging field that focuses on how efficacious interventions should be modified so that similar results can be achieved in different settings with more diverse populations [ 10 ]. In their qualitative evaluation of 19 community-based obesity programs in Missouri, Dreisinger et al developed a framework of individual, organizational, community, and intervention factors that are critical for widespread obesity program distribution [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%