Research topic flows in co-authorship networks

Abstract

In scientometrics, scientific collaboration is often analyzed by means of co-authorships. An aspect which is often overlooked and more difficult to quantify is the flow of expertise between authors from different research topics, which is an important part of scientific progress. With the Topic Flow Network (TFN) we propose a graph structure for the analysis of research topic flows between scientific authors and their respective research fields. Based on a multi-graph and a topic model, our proposed network structure accounts for intratopic as well as intertopic flows. Our method requires for the construction of a TFN solely a corpus of publications (i.e., author and abstract information). From this, research topics are discovered automatically through non-negative matrix factorization. The thereof derived TFN allows for the application of social network analysis techniques, such as common metrics and community detection. Most importantly, it allows for the analysis of intertopic flows on a large, macroscopic scale, i.e., between research topic, as well as on a microscopic scale, i.e., between certain sets of authors. We demonstrate the utility of TFNs by applying our method to two comprehensive corpora of altogether 20 Mio. publications spanning more than 60 years of research in the fields computer science and mathematics. Our results give evidence that Topic Flow Networks are suitable, e.g., for the analysis of topical communities, the discovery of important authors in different fields, and, most notably, the analysis of intertopic flows, i.e., the transfer of topical expertise. Besides that, our method opens new directions for future research, such as the investigation of influence relationships between research fields.

Research Hotspots and Trends of Social Robot Interaction Design: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…Through author co-citations, we can study the more active scholars in the field of SRID research around the world [96,97]. A total of 7053 authors within the search scope have contributed to the research field of SRID.…”

Uses of artificial intelligence and machine learning in systematic reviews of education research

“…Citation relations can be part of a network analysis through techniques such as co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis, and other metadata connected to a publication allows for drawing on co-publication patterns, keyword or topic clusters or other relational concepts in several stages of the review process. Similarly, making use of institutional and geographic distributions can provide insights into regional interest or relevance, and utilizing the temporal patterns of citations can aid in research trend or topic flow analysis (Schäfermeier, Hirth, and Hanika 2022).…”