2021
DOI: 10.1002/nur.22128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researcher practitioner engagement in health research: The development of a new concept

Abstract: The engagement of frontline practitioners in the production of research-derived knowledge is often advocated. Doing so can address perceived gaps between what is known from research and what happens in clinical practice. Engagement practices span a continuum, from co-production approaches underpinned by principles of equality and power sharing to those which can minimalize practitioners' contributions to the knowledge production process. We observed a conceptual gap in published healthcare literature that labe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Dazu haben wir eine Anleitung zur Konzeptentwicklung 15 und ein Beispiel ihrer Umsetzung 4 genutzt. Folgende Schritte sind zu gehen:…”
Section: Forschungswegunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dazu haben wir eine Anleitung zur Konzeptentwicklung 15 und ein Beispiel ihrer Umsetzung 4 genutzt. Folgende Schritte sind zu gehen:…”
Section: Forschungswegunclassified
“…systematische Literaturrecherche, Auswertung nach Wünschen der Familie und Ansichten der Fachpersonen, die die 3 Hinweise von Baltes und Baltes 2 ergänzen könnten…”
Section: Forschungswegunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Morgan (2010) suggests that reporting focus group findings can include not only the use of quotations from individuals, but also text to give insight into the group interactions and present sequences of interactions where they best illustrate the point, for example, "when the mere mention of a new topic produces rapid-fire responses from several different participants" or the intensity of feeling with which a point is stated (Redmond and Curtis 2009, p xx). In our own focus group research, we have included detailed reporting of both verbal and non-verbal interactions (Russell et al 2018;Daniels et al 2021). Doing so provided transparency on how participants interacted and how interactions generated data.…”
Section: Focus Group Interactions In a Modern Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of funding agencies have made stakeholder engagement a requirement for research studies [ 5 , 8 ]. Different aspects of the contextualization of healthcare professional engagement, such as type, stage and level of engagement, facilitators and barriers and impact, have been documented in the literature [ 3 , 5 , 9 ]. A review of pilot projects of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) found that 87% of researchers reported engaging clinicians [ 5 ] and that the main reasons for engaging clinicians were to benefit from their expertise, to obtain clinician buy-in and to ensure more meaningful results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%