Methods of Sustainability Research in the Social Sciences 2013
DOI: 10.4135/9781526401748.n10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researching Complex Sustainability Issues: Reflections on Current Challenges and Future Developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within sustainability research, the deployment of large-scale attitudinal surveys is often critiqued for their tendency to provide a superficial identification of consumption issues rather than a deep investigation into the underlying rationale behind the responses and detailed exploration of such actions. While surveys are not without their limitations, it is still important to acknowledge the significance of large data sets for critically inspired and progressively orientated research agendas (Fahy and Rau 2013). This methodological approach is important and its merits are widely recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within sustainability research, the deployment of large-scale attitudinal surveys is often critiqued for their tendency to provide a superficial identification of consumption issues rather than a deep investigation into the underlying rationale behind the responses and detailed exploration of such actions. While surveys are not without their limitations, it is still important to acknowledge the significance of large data sets for critically inspired and progressively orientated research agendas (Fahy and Rau 2013). This methodological approach is important and its merits are widely recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study relied on self-reported data and such data are susceptible to numerous biases such as recall bias, confidence bias, and/or social desirability bias, which may limit the interpretation and generalization of the study's findings. Although self-report measures utilized on surveys often provide a pragmatic and cost-effective way to measure pro-environmental behaviors (Fahy and Rau 2013), researchers who attempt to measure and report pro-environmental behaviors through the use of reported behavioral indices on survey instruments must be cautious of inaccurate reporting of actual behaviors (Barr and Prillwitz 2013;Gatersleben, Steg, and Vlek 2002;Viklund 2004). Another potential weakness related to scale (both in time and space) is inherent when employing this type of methodological approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was necessitated by the fact that smallholder community irrigation schemes involve multiple stakeholders from multiple sectors and disciplines, whose "multiple viewpoints, perspectives, positions, and standpoints" need to be considered (Johnson et al, 2007), to circumvent the risk of "doing violence to the complexity and diversity" of smallholder irrigation system (Soy, 2006). A commitment to inter-disciplinarity is often seen as a necessary precondition for successful resilience research, connecting people"s time use patterns with their spatial and material footprints (Fahy and Rau, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%