Researching on inclusive education in Spain: how does action research question the roles adopted by researchers in knowledge mobilization processes?

Ribés, Aida Sanahuja; García, Odet Moliner; Escobedo, Paula

doi:10.1080/09650792.2021.2000457

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Undoubtedly, conducting more research on inclusive education according to the action research design will contribute to the literature on the subject. When international literature is examined, research on inclusive education conducted with action research methods is limited (Ainscow et al, 2004;Armstrong & Moore, 2004;Sanahuja et al, 2021).…”

Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Scientific Research on Inclusive Education

Izgar

Ilter

2022

Research on Education and Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to examine the scientific research, including postgraduate theses and scientific articles related to inclusive education, carried out in Turkey in terms of some various variables. The study was designed using the document analysis technique, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The study data were collected from postgraduate theses in the Higher Education Council (CoHE) National Thesis Center and scientific articles found in the TUBITAK ULAKBIM TR-Index database. A descriptive analytic method was used to analyze the data of the study. The results revealed that the scientific research on inclusive education in Turkey is currently not at a sufficient level. A total of nine different universities published postgraduate thesis studies about inclusive education. These postgraduate theses are carried out in nine different fields of study. In particular, social studies education was found to be the field of study that examined the subject of inclusive education the most among postgraduate theses. On the other hand, it was found that the teaching activities or practices were mostly addressed in those research on inclusive education, and the sample group mostly consisted of teachers. Furthermore, the results showed that the scientific research was mostly designed using qualitative research methods, and that the interview method was mostly used as a data collection method. In light of the findings of this study, some recommendations were made to researchers.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Scientific Research on Inclusive Education

Izgar

Ilter

2022

Research on Education and Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Taking an inclusive approach to research implies active citizen participation, and particularly engaging vulnerable groups in the research process (Nind 2017). Its origins lie in collaborative studies with people with intellectual impairments, in which the individuals being studied are involved in decision making and carrying out the research (Sanahuja, Moliner, and Escobedo 2021). The discussion introduced by Nind (2014) on how inclus-ive education embraces other related approaches such as participatory and emancipatory research is interesting.…”

Section: From Social Responsibility To Inclusive Responsible Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge mobilisation strategies for responsible and inclusive academic research

Ciges

Ferrández-Berrueco

Ribés

et al. 2022

European Journal of Higher Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present article introduces the concept of knowledge mobilisation (KMb) strategies in university research by linking university social responsibility with the concept of inclusive and responsible research, which implies an ethical perspective of equity and inclusion in responding to citizens' needs. The study objective is to discover the ethical position and KMb strategies in 80 research groups from five European countries. The amount and type of strategies applied are analysed from information gathered in semistructured interviews and from KMb indicators. The results show that these strategies are still not widely used and point to four key elements in researchers' ethical positions: commitment, knowledge recognition, dialogue and cooperation. Strategies range from the initial formulation of the research problem to a sustainability plan for the research projects. The conclusions identify an emancipatory ethical perspective that rebalances power relationships between researchers and stakeholders, but that generates tension with public research policies and research quality evaluation criteria.

show abstract

The current state of integrating equity, diversity and inclusion into knowledge mobilization: a systematic literature review

Cornelius-Hernandez,

Clarke

2024

EDI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to systematically review and analyze the academic literature on integrating equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) into knowledge mobilization (KMb).Design/methodology/approachThis systematic literature review of the body of scholarly literature published on integrating EDI with KMb follows established methods and protocols proposed by Popay et al. (2006) and Page et al. (2021). Using a relevant keyword string, a search was conducted in ProQuest and SCOPUS to find peer-reviewed articles, which were then screened using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, inductive and deductive analyses were conducted on the selected articles.FindingsThe findings suggest that most of the authors are based in the Global North, the majority of literature was published in the last two years, and that it is conceptual. This synthesis highlights five solution-oriented themes: acknowledging inherent bias, centering marginalized groups, promoting responsible knowledge mobilization, establishing partnerships, and advocating for transformational and systemic change. This study also identifies four broad barriers: inherent, unconscious, and implicit biases, a lack of evidence-based best practices, siloing of research and information, and a lack of institutional support and resources. Findings also highlight the value of further research into barriers, gaps and opportunities.Originality/valueBy studying the intersection of EDI and KMb, this contemporary synthesis of the state of the field presents opportunities for future research into gaps, barriers and potential solutions.

show abstract

Researching on inclusive education in Spain: how does action research question the roles adopted by researchers in knowledge mobilization processes?

Cited by 3 publications

References 28 publications

Analysis of the Scientific Research on Inclusive Education

Analysis of the Scientific Research on Inclusive Education

Knowledge mobilisation strategies for responsible and inclusive academic research

The current state of integrating equity, diversity and inclusion into knowledge mobilization: a systematic literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About