2015
DOI: 10.1002/hed.24075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resection margins in oral cancer surgery: Room for improvement

Abstract: The purpose of this review was to identify publications on resection margins in oral cancer surgery and compare these with the results from 2 Dutch academic medical centers. Eight publications were considered relevant for this study, reporting 30% to 65% inadequate resection margins (ie, positive and close margins), compared to 85% in Dutch centers. However, clinical outcome in terms of overall survival and recurrence seemed comparable. The misleading difference is caused by lack of unanimous margin definition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

8
120
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve a better local control, the surgeon should try to obtain both superficial and deep clear margins. Considering that inadequate resection margins are reported between 30% and 65%, this represents a difficult task for the clinician. Recently, the intraoperative use of narrow band imaging (NBI) emerged as a promising tool to help the surgeon in the assessment of the real superficial extension of oral, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal cancer .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve a better local control, the surgeon should try to obtain both superficial and deep clear margins. Considering that inadequate resection margins are reported between 30% and 65%, this represents a difficult task for the clinician. Recently, the intraoperative use of narrow band imaging (NBI) emerged as a promising tool to help the surgeon in the assessment of the real superficial extension of oral, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal cancer .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) is the most common malignancy in the head and neck region and is primarily treated surgically [15]. Goal of the surgical resection is to completely remove the tumor with adequate resection margins, to avoid the need for subsequent additional treatment such as repeated surgery or (chemo-) radiotherapy and to minimize functional impairment related to the procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although definite information on the deep resection margins requires postoperative histopathological analysis, peroperative information on the resection margins could help to optimize resection volume. Unfortunately, definite information on these resection margins is not yet available during surgery [1, 2]. Translation of information from preoperative imaging into the actual situation in the patient during surgery is challenging; macroscopic evaluation of a tumor in the tongue by palpation during surgery is difficult and inaccurate, and peroperative biopsies or frozen sections may suffer from sample error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete removal of primary tumour with respect to precise surgical margins is an important factor deciding prognosis for many cancers including oral cancer. Despite progress in imaging techniques, the clinical outcome of the patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is unsatisfactory, as the reported 5-year survival rate is 50%, which is mainly due to the incomplete removal of primary tumour1. The detection of oral carcinoma using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-induced PPIX fluorescence has recognized histologically malignant tissues and shown clear cut margins in 63% cases, keratinization of the tissues was the limitation for accurate diagnosis2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%