2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-005-3134-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resection of Sternal Tumors and Reconstruction of the Thorax: A Review of 15 Patients

Abstract: Wide resection of sternal tumors provides good local control. Reconstruction with Marlex and stainless-steel mesh seems to be the most effective technique for repairing a wide anterior chest wall defect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional operative techniques in the similar chest wall reconstructions are based on using sandwiched Marlex and stainless-steel mesh with metacylate as a material for the reconstruction [15,16], free and pedicled bone grafts (ribs), periosteal flaps, strips of fascia lata, fascia lata flaps and pedicled muscle flaps [17], polypropylene mesh-resin sandwich [18,19], or titanium micromesh covered with Marlex mesh [20]. In these cases, the prostheses are shaped by hand during the operation without taking into account the geometry that preceded the illness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional operative techniques in the similar chest wall reconstructions are based on using sandwiched Marlex and stainless-steel mesh with metacylate as a material for the reconstruction [15,16], free and pedicled bone grafts (ribs), periosteal flaps, strips of fascia lata, fascia lata flaps and pedicled muscle flaps [17], polypropylene mesh-resin sandwich [18,19], or titanium micromesh covered with Marlex mesh [20]. In these cases, the prostheses are shaped by hand during the operation without taking into account the geometry that preceded the illness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polypropylene mesh (Marlex mesh,R) is used most frequently for the reconstruction of chest wall defects. Although this mesh is relatively easy to handle and has a high affinity for tissues [27], its lack of rigidity in patients with large defects may result in paradoxical chest wall motion [28]. In contrast, methyl methacrylate and titanium plates are highly rigid but insufficiently malleable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their rigidity is insufficient to protect intrathoracic organs. Various prostheses have been used, with sufficient rigidity, such as sandwiched polypropylene mesh and stainless steel mesh [3], methyl methacrylate sandwiched between polypropylene mesh [4], titanium plate-supported methyl methacrylate sandwich [5], titanium plate with Gore-Tex ® dual mesh [6], and Composix Mesh ™ [7]. However, methyl methacrylate is not easy to handle and is difficult to adapt to the shape of the patient’s chest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%