2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reserve requirements as a macroprudential instrument – Empirical evidence from Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
32
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Krznar and Morsink (2014) establish that recent rounds of MaP tightening in Canada have reduced mortgage credit growth and house price growth. Glocker and Towbin (2015) show that an increase in reserve requirements leads to a contraction in domestic credit, a depreciation of the exchange rate, a current account improvement, and an increase in prices. Lim et al (2011) show that for 49 countries reviewed, MaPs helped to reduce procyclicality, meaning a reduced sensitivity of credit conditions to GDP growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krznar and Morsink (2014) establish that recent rounds of MaP tightening in Canada have reduced mortgage credit growth and house price growth. Glocker and Towbin (2015) show that an increase in reserve requirements leads to a contraction in domestic credit, a depreciation of the exchange rate, a current account improvement, and an increase in prices. Lim et al (2011) show that for 49 countries reviewed, MaPs helped to reduce procyclicality, meaning a reduced sensitivity of credit conditions to GDP growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also find, in one of our robustness tests, that both shocks have effects on real consumption and real investment. Our baseline results 4 For similar arguments, see, for instance, Kim and Mehrotra (2018) and Glocker and Towbin (2015). 5 Under the Bank of Korea Act, which took effect in 2011, the country's central bank was also provided a mandate to pursue financial stability objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In reality, many central banks around the world have already abolished the reserve requirement since the introduction of deposit insurance by FDIC and Basel II-type regulation that emphasizes on capital rather than reserves (Di Giorgio 1999). Yet reserve requirement is still in place in many central banks that not only use it as a protection against deposit loss and bank run, but also proactively manipulate reserve requirement as an effective macroprudential policy instrument (Glocker and Towbin, 2015;Fungáčová, Nuutilainen and Weill, 2016). In the US, the reserve requirement is set at 10% for transaction accounts over $122.3 million, while for other countries the requirement ranges from none to over 40%.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%