2018
DOI: 10.4314/jasem.v22i4.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reservoir fluid determination from angle stacked seismic volumes in ‘Jay’ field, Niger Delta, Nigeria

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The study was carried out to investigate the dissimilar seismic amplitude responses observed in sandstone reservoirs with the same fluid saturation. This challenge now informed the analysis of different amplitude responses from the 'Jay' Field in order to verify the reservoirs fluids around and away from well location based on the integration of Amplitude Variation with Angle (AVA) and seismic inversions. The well log data provided were used to identify hydrocarbon bearing zones and Poisson Ratio anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating the volume of shale in the formation is the first step in the reservoir characterization, formation evaluation, and log interpretation processes because it is necessary to determine the formation's porosity and fluid content [11] [12]. The presence of shale in the formation has a variety of effects on the response of logging tools (Adeoti et al, 2009) [10] and the petrophysical characteristics of the reservoir, reducing its effective porosity and permeability and increasing the uncertainty surrounding the evaluation of the formation and reservoir characterization [11]. This section will deal especially with how shale volume determination in the formation is determined by logging devices such as gamma ray, neutron density log, resistivity log, and sonic log.…”
Section: Shale Volume Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating the volume of shale in the formation is the first step in the reservoir characterization, formation evaluation, and log interpretation processes because it is necessary to determine the formation's porosity and fluid content [11] [12]. The presence of shale in the formation has a variety of effects on the response of logging tools (Adeoti et al, 2009) [10] and the petrophysical characteristics of the reservoir, reducing its effective porosity and permeability and increasing the uncertainty surrounding the evaluation of the formation and reservoir characterization [11]. This section will deal especially with how shale volume determination in the formation is determined by logging devices such as gamma ray, neutron density log, resistivity log, and sonic log.…”
Section: Shale Volume Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murho and density are both lithology discriminators but density can also be used for fluid prediction, this is one of the advantages of density over Mu-Rho has seen from the crossplots [33]. In theory, sand will have a high value of Mu-Rho and a low value of shale [38] but in this field, the results of the cross-plots show that the Mu-Rho values are high for shale and low for sand while the density of shale is higher than that of sand [2,33]. Furthermore, hydrocarbon bearing sand is less dense than brine (even as hydrocarbon gas is less dense than oil) and brine is less dense than shale [2,33].…”
Section: Mu-rho Against Rhomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the recently developed rock physics template (RPT) technique [36] can estimate the fluid and mineralogical content of a reservoir rock on a cross plot of Vp/Vs ratio against the AI of a P wave (Figure 2). This method has been described in numerous publications [2,11,13,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], including focused studies of elastic parameter recognition and RPT analysis of Polish shales [3,4,10,21,[41][42][43]. The process of successfully integrating data at different scales represents the biggest challenge in generating detailed 3D models of reservoirs.…”
Section: Parameters Relation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of successfully integrating data at different scales represents the biggest challenge in generating detailed 3D models of reservoirs. In response to this problem, some studies have applied the RPT technique to multi-scale laboratory data, well log data, and seismic data [37][38][39]43], though further research is required to determine best practices for this technique. Here, we report the results of multidisciplinary characterization of an unconventional reservoir based on relationships between various reservoir parameters in 1D, 2D, and 3D.…”
Section: Parameters Relation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%