Lower Burgan, a giant clastic reservoir in Sabiriyah field of North Kuwait was discovered during mid 50s (Location map shown in Figure-1). An integrated performance analysis recently carried out indicated that the reservoir has a much higher potential than anticipated earlier. Though the cumulative recovery till date was more than 70% of the initial recoverable reserves, the reservoir pressure decline was insignificant with average water cut of about 20% only in this active water drive reservoir. Significant additional open hole data in new well penetrations, cased hole log data, seismic re-interpretation, additional production performance and pressure data acquired since last major reservoir update in 1998, has considerably improved the reservoir potential understanding of Lower Burgan.
Although reservoir performance suggested possibility of larger STOIIP base, lack of sufficient mapped net pay area impacted the deterministic STOIIP estimation negatively in the past. The additional information obtained in the new wells has opened up a large additional pay area by way of structural refinement, lowering of OOWC and additional net sands mostly in L-member. Whilst number of wells drilled in southwest flank and in north and south indicated possible occurrence of a deeper OOWC than earlier interpretations, SA-X1, the well drilled and tested beyond the reservoir limit in southern area, produced dry oil from sands with high Sw.
In order to assess the full potential of new reservoir area and to test the mobility of oil below the hitherto OOWC, a detailed testing program was formulated and implemented. MDT sampling was undertaken at several wells with successful results to prove the mobility of oil. Rigless perforation/ testing job were done at one of the identified wells, showing only traces of oil. Cores were cut with full suite of open hole logs and the RFT data. Production testing at newly completed wells, long term build up tests, PLT data and RST logs confirmed the additional potential for this mature reservoir, which was supposed to be on decline as per earlier predictions.
The paper is a classic example as to how a mature reservoir has been re-assessed and brought to the development limelight in terms of enhanced STOIIP, Reserves and production.
Reservoir Description
The Lower Burgan comprises a broadly transgressive succession of paralic clastic- sediments. Fluvial processes dominate in the lower part of the formation; influences from marine processes became stronger upwards. Higher frequency changes in sea level become more important in the upper part of the formation, making this part of the reservoir more complex.The reservoir architecture was defined by the depositional processes, which were mostly channel processes. The internal make-up of these channels depended on the relative degree of marine influence, and they range from fully fluvial channels, through deltaic channels, tidally influenced channels, and more marine estuarine channel fills.
Reservoir Layering
Sequence Stratigraphy is used as main basis for layering scheme of this reservoir. The key correlatable surfaces that mark significant landward or basinward shifts are identified on the basis of core study and distinctive characteristics on wireline logs. Based on the above Lower Burgan was divided into six layers-LB25, 50,55,70,80 & 100 (Badely Ashton). Later on it was felt that the Badley Ashton layering was not sufficient to define flow property of the reservoir. Therefore, based on reservoir pressure and flow behavior, the lower Burgan reservoir has been divided into as many as thirteen layers /flow units. It includes the key stratigraphic surfaces identified by Badley Ashton, together with some additional intermediate surfaces, which were later found, by Badley Ashton, not to have stratigraphic significance. Figure 2 compares the new, and Badley Ashton correlation schemes, and relates them to the traditional division of the Lower Burgan into a massive lower sand unit, called the M member, and an upper interbedded unit of sands and shales, called the L member. The boundary between L and M varies from well to well and cuts across the stratigraphy.