2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.2016.7733561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reset-based recovery for real-time cyber-physical systems with temporal safety constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…References Approaches CPS Abad et al 31 System-level simplex extended technique Mohan et al 32 S3A Easwaran et al 33 Security analysis structure Automotive systems Lin et al 34,35 Security-aware design technique Kiran et al 36 Integrated MILP formulation Apvrille and Roudier 37 SysML-Sec Clusters Xie et al 38 Security overhead model Xie and Qin 39 TAPADS Tripathi et al 40 Schedule algorithm…”
Section: Classi¯cationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…References Approaches CPS Abad et al 31 System-level simplex extended technique Mohan et al 32 S3A Easwaran et al 33 Security analysis structure Automotive systems Lin et al 34,35 Security-aware design technique Kiran et al 36 Integrated MILP formulation Apvrille and Roudier 37 SysML-Sec Clusters Xie et al 38 Security overhead model Xie and Qin 39 TAPADS Tripathi et al 40 Schedule algorithm…”
Section: Classi¯cationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the researchers concentrate on developing security-aware energy-e±cient task scheduling mechanisms [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] that cannot only promote the system safety performance but also improve the system energy e±ciency. The third category to realize a secure system is investigating the safety issues in speci¯c applications such as cyber-physical systems (CPSs), [31][32][33] automotive systems, [34][35][36][37] clusters, [38][39][40] grids, [41][42][43] etc. Contribution and organization: A large amount of state-of-art approaches designed for security-aware RTES are summarized in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Base Controller keeps the system inside a subset of safety region by updating the actuator input at least once after every system restart. In [19], which is variation of System-Level Simplex, authors propose that the complex subsystem can be restarted upon the occurrence of faults. In this design, safe restarting is possible because the back up controller runs on a dedicated processing unit and is not impacted by the restarts in the complex subsystem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Bak et al implemented the safety-critical parts of the system-safety controller and decision logic-in FPGA so that it can tolerate systemlevel faults in the computer system running the performance controller for an inverted pendulum and a cardiac pacemaker [14]. [10] is an extension of simplex architecture and Abdi et al showed that a software fault in cyber-physical system can be recovered by restarting the system at runtime. In [12], Abdi et al proposed a novel approach to design a controller that enables the system to restart and remain safe during and after the restart.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%